Response to De Vroey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Authors

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • Universidade de Brasília

Abstract

This paper is a response to Michel De Vroey's review of our book, published in this issue of EJHET. Differently from De Vroey's, our aim is to understand the theoretical choices with which economists believed they were confronted at the time. This is reflected in the organisation of our book, the selection of topics (disequilibrium, imperfect competition, etc.), and the conclusions about the fate of disequilibrium macroeconomics.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)743-749
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Volume21
Issue number4
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Disequilibrium, imperfect competition, macroeconomics