Response to Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

134 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is a response given at the book launch for Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), hosted jointly, in November 2020, by the Centre for Catholic Studies, Durham University, and the Australian Catholic University. The response considers the gap between the textual Kant (as set out by Insole), and the received Kant, and reflects on how theologians have been too quick either to condemn and dismiss (a poorly interpreted) Kant, or to rehabilitate Kant for theological projects, which Kant would have been opposed to, given his deepest philosophical commitments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-297
JournalStudies in Christian ethics
Volume34
Issue number3
Early online date6 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Christianity
  • Kant
  • divine
  • divinity
  • reception
  • theology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this