Research Note: Using effectiveness studies for prescribing research, Part 1

Nick Freemantle, Joanne Eastaugh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The process of evaluating pharmaceuticals has become highly conceptualized in contrast to the lack of formal rules for assessing effects of interventions on practice. We argue that clinical audit is a key factor prior to instigating an intervention and that randomized controlled evaluations are preferable. We discuss the need for small-scale experiments prior to full trials to validate the underlying concept of an intervention with the recognition that different approaches may be necessary. This includes open rather than blind assessments and greater emphasis on qualitative issues during development of interventions followed by quantitative appraisal of their impact.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)383-389
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
    Volume27
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2002

    Keywords

    • randomized controlled trials
    • implementation
    • clinical practice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Research Note: Using effectiveness studies for prescribing research, Part 1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this