Quantifying the beliefs of key players in the UK sheep industry on the efficacy of two treatments for footrot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Quantifying the beliefs of key players in the UK sheep industry on the efficacy of two treatments for footrot. / Winter, Joanne R.; Green, Laura E.

In: The Veterinary Journal , Vol. 239, 09.2018, p. 15-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{cd938fa6ffa84523b3d91fff5d015dbe,
title = "Quantifying the beliefs of key players in the UK sheep industry on the efficacy of two treatments for footrot",
abstract = "Clinical trials have demonstrated that sheep with footrot treated with parenteral and topical antibiotic treatment without foot trimming (treatment A), have achieved cure faster than sheep treated with foot trimming and topical antibiotic (treatment B). We investigated how key players in the UK sheep industry recommended treating footrot, and tested whether reviewing the evidence surrounding treatment of footrot changed their beliefs. Eight key players attended a workshop to investigate current practice, and their perceived efficacy of treatments using probabilistic elicitation. All participants recommended use of antibiotic injection but only four recommended not foot trimming feet with footrot. Initial beliefs in the difference in cure rate within five days of treatment ranged from 30-97% in favour of treatment A (true difference 60%); this heterogeneity reduced after reviewing the evidence. Participants who believed the cure rate differed by >60% over-estimated the cure rate of treatment A whilst participants who believed the difference was ",
keywords = "Expert elicitation, Evidence base, Footrot treatment efficacy, Key players, Sheep",
author = "Winter, {Joanne R.} and Green, {Laura E.}",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.07.009",
language = "English",
volume = "239",
pages = "15--20",
journal = "The Veterinary Journal ",
issn = "1090-0233",
publisher = "Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the beliefs of key players in the UK sheep industry on the efficacy of two treatments for footrot

AU - Winter, Joanne R.

AU - Green, Laura E.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Clinical trials have demonstrated that sheep with footrot treated with parenteral and topical antibiotic treatment without foot trimming (treatment A), have achieved cure faster than sheep treated with foot trimming and topical antibiotic (treatment B). We investigated how key players in the UK sheep industry recommended treating footrot, and tested whether reviewing the evidence surrounding treatment of footrot changed their beliefs. Eight key players attended a workshop to investigate current practice, and their perceived efficacy of treatments using probabilistic elicitation. All participants recommended use of antibiotic injection but only four recommended not foot trimming feet with footrot. Initial beliefs in the difference in cure rate within five days of treatment ranged from 30-97% in favour of treatment A (true difference 60%); this heterogeneity reduced after reviewing the evidence. Participants who believed the cure rate differed by >60% over-estimated the cure rate of treatment A whilst participants who believed the difference was

AB - Clinical trials have demonstrated that sheep with footrot treated with parenteral and topical antibiotic treatment without foot trimming (treatment A), have achieved cure faster than sheep treated with foot trimming and topical antibiotic (treatment B). We investigated how key players in the UK sheep industry recommended treating footrot, and tested whether reviewing the evidence surrounding treatment of footrot changed their beliefs. Eight key players attended a workshop to investigate current practice, and their perceived efficacy of treatments using probabilistic elicitation. All participants recommended use of antibiotic injection but only four recommended not foot trimming feet with footrot. Initial beliefs in the difference in cure rate within five days of treatment ranged from 30-97% in favour of treatment A (true difference 60%); this heterogeneity reduced after reviewing the evidence. Participants who believed the cure rate differed by >60% over-estimated the cure rate of treatment A whilst participants who believed the difference was

KW - Expert elicitation

KW - Evidence base

KW - Footrot treatment efficacy

KW - Key players

KW - Sheep

U2 - 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.07.009

M3 - Article

VL - 239

SP - 15

EP - 20

JO - The Veterinary Journal

JF - The Veterinary Journal

SN - 1090-0233

ER -