Professional autonomy and surveillance: the case of public reporting in cardiac surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • Cardiff University
  • Royal Holloway, University of London

Abstract

Professional autonomy has come under greater scrutiny due to managerialism, consumerism, information and communication technologies (ICT), and the changing composition of professions themselves. This scrutiny is often portrayed as a tension between professional and managerial logics. Recently, medical autonomy has increasingly been shaped in terms of transparency, where publication of clinical performance (via ICT) might be a more pervasive form of surveillance. Such transparency may have the potential for a more explicit managerial logic but is contested by clinicians. This paper applies notions of surveillance to public reporting of cardiac surgery, involving the online publication of mortality rates of named surgeons. It draws on qualitative data from a casestudy of cardiac surgeons in one hospital, incorporating interviews with health care managers and national policymakers in England. We examine how managerial logics are mediated by professional autonomy, generating patterns of enrolment, resistance and reactivity to public reporting. The managerial ‘gaze’ of public reporting is becoming widespread but the surgical specialty is accommodating it, leading to a re-assertion of knowledge, based on professional definitions. The paper assesses whether this form of surveillance is challenging to or being assimilated by the medical profession, thereby recasting the profession itself

Bibliographic note

© 2019 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1040-1055
Number of pages16
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume41
Issue number6
Early online date15 Mar 2019
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • autonomy, medical profession, public reporting, surgeons, surveillance