Prime Ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979-2010: A corpus-assisted analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Prime Ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979-2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. / Bates, Stephen; Sealey, Alison.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 104, 10.2016, p. 18-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{f4950cf223604bc6a7ed7e971cfe7d79,
title = "Prime Ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister{\textquoteright}s Questions 1979-2010: A corpus-assisted analysis",
abstract = "This article analyses prime ministerial self-representation in the context of responses to the questions put to four recent British Prime Ministers during Prime Minister's Questions. From the transcripts of these PMs{\textquoteright} contributions to PMQs, all the clauses with {\textquoteleft}I{\textquoteright} as subject were identified. Corpus analysis software was used to calculate which are the most frequent verbs of which {\textquoteleft}I{\textquoteright} is the subject when PMs answer questions during PMQs. The verbs were classified semantically, and pragmatic and rhetorical patterns were identified. Results show a high proportion of cognitive and communicative processes, as opposed to verbs denoting physical or material actions. Through the close analysis of PMs{\textquoteright} utterances featuring structures with {\textquoteleft}I{\textquoteright} and three frequent verbs – think, understand and say – we explore patterns in their argumentation, management of face and authority, and identification with the norms of this political institution as well as those of the wider society. We argue that normative influences on what PMs represent themselves as doing include explicit constraints on parliamentary behaviour, an adversarial culture that persists despite long-standing criticisms, and the requirement to conform both to the conventions of this ritualised discourse situation and to broader socio-cultural expectations.",
keywords = "Prime Minister's Questions, Parliament, Parliamentary discourse, Corpus-assisted analysis, Face management, Adversarial discourse",
author = "Stephen Bates and Alison Sealey",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.010",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "18--31",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prime Ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979-2010: A corpus-assisted analysis

AU - Bates, Stephen

AU - Sealey, Alison

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - This article analyses prime ministerial self-representation in the context of responses to the questions put to four recent British Prime Ministers during Prime Minister's Questions. From the transcripts of these PMs’ contributions to PMQs, all the clauses with ‘I’ as subject were identified. Corpus analysis software was used to calculate which are the most frequent verbs of which ‘I’ is the subject when PMs answer questions during PMQs. The verbs were classified semantically, and pragmatic and rhetorical patterns were identified. Results show a high proportion of cognitive and communicative processes, as opposed to verbs denoting physical or material actions. Through the close analysis of PMs’ utterances featuring structures with ‘I’ and three frequent verbs – think, understand and say – we explore patterns in their argumentation, management of face and authority, and identification with the norms of this political institution as well as those of the wider society. We argue that normative influences on what PMs represent themselves as doing include explicit constraints on parliamentary behaviour, an adversarial culture that persists despite long-standing criticisms, and the requirement to conform both to the conventions of this ritualised discourse situation and to broader socio-cultural expectations.

AB - This article analyses prime ministerial self-representation in the context of responses to the questions put to four recent British Prime Ministers during Prime Minister's Questions. From the transcripts of these PMs’ contributions to PMQs, all the clauses with ‘I’ as subject were identified. Corpus analysis software was used to calculate which are the most frequent verbs of which ‘I’ is the subject when PMs answer questions during PMQs. The verbs were classified semantically, and pragmatic and rhetorical patterns were identified. Results show a high proportion of cognitive and communicative processes, as opposed to verbs denoting physical or material actions. Through the close analysis of PMs’ utterances featuring structures with ‘I’ and three frequent verbs – think, understand and say – we explore patterns in their argumentation, management of face and authority, and identification with the norms of this political institution as well as those of the wider society. We argue that normative influences on what PMs represent themselves as doing include explicit constraints on parliamentary behaviour, an adversarial culture that persists despite long-standing criticisms, and the requirement to conform both to the conventions of this ritualised discourse situation and to broader socio-cultural expectations.

KW - Prime Minister's Questions

KW - Parliament

KW - Parliamentary discourse

KW - Corpus-assisted analysis

KW - Face management

KW - Adversarial discourse

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.010

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 18

EP - 31

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -