TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in high risk patients: community based epidemiological study
AU - Davis, Russell
AU - Hobbs, Frederick
AU - Kenkre, Joyce
AU - Roalfe, Andrea
AU - Iles, Rachel
AU - Lancashire, Robert
AU - Davies, Michael
PY - 2002/11/16
Y1 - 2002/11/16
N2 - Objectives To determine the prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and of heart failure due to different causes, in patients with risk factors for these conditions. Design Epidemiological study, including detailed clinical assessment, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Setting 16 English general practices, representative for socioeconomic status and practice type. Participants 1062 patients (66% response rate) with previous myocardial infarction, angina, hypertension, or diabetes. Main outcome measures Prevalence of systolic dysfunction, both with and without symptoms, and of heart failure, in groups of patients with each of the risk factors. Results Definite systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%) was found in 54/244 (22.1%, 95% confidence interval 17.1% to 27.9%) patients with previous myocardial infarction, 26/321 (8.1%, 5.4% to 11.6%) with angina, 7/388 (1.8%, 0.7% to 3.7%) with hypertension, and 12/208 (5.8%, 3.0% to 9.9%) with diabetes. In each group, approximately half of these patients had symptoms of dyspnoea, and therefore had heart failure. Overall rates of heart failure, defined as symptoms of dyspnoea plus objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction (systolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, or clinically significant valve disease) were 16.0% (11.6% to 21.2%) in patients with previous myocardial infarction, 8.4% (5.6% to 12.0%) in those with angina, 2.8% (1.4% to 5.0%) in those with hypertension, and 7.7% (4.5% to 12.21%) in those with diabetes. Conclusion Many people with ischaemic heart disease or diabetes have systolic dysfunction or heart failure. The data support the need for trials of targeted echocardiographic screening, in view of the major benefits of modern treatment. In contrast, patients with uncomplicated hypertension have similar rates to the general population.
AB - Objectives To determine the prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and of heart failure due to different causes, in patients with risk factors for these conditions. Design Epidemiological study, including detailed clinical assessment, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Setting 16 English general practices, representative for socioeconomic status and practice type. Participants 1062 patients (66% response rate) with previous myocardial infarction, angina, hypertension, or diabetes. Main outcome measures Prevalence of systolic dysfunction, both with and without symptoms, and of heart failure, in groups of patients with each of the risk factors. Results Definite systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%) was found in 54/244 (22.1%, 95% confidence interval 17.1% to 27.9%) patients with previous myocardial infarction, 26/321 (8.1%, 5.4% to 11.6%) with angina, 7/388 (1.8%, 0.7% to 3.7%) with hypertension, and 12/208 (5.8%, 3.0% to 9.9%) with diabetes. In each group, approximately half of these patients had symptoms of dyspnoea, and therefore had heart failure. Overall rates of heart failure, defined as symptoms of dyspnoea plus objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction (systolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, or clinically significant valve disease) were 16.0% (11.6% to 21.2%) in patients with previous myocardial infarction, 8.4% (5.6% to 12.0%) in those with angina, 2.8% (1.4% to 5.0%) in those with hypertension, and 7.7% (4.5% to 12.21%) in those with diabetes. Conclusion Many people with ischaemic heart disease or diabetes have systolic dysfunction or heart failure. The data support the need for trials of targeted echocardiographic screening, in view of the major benefits of modern treatment. In contrast, patients with uncomplicated hypertension have similar rates to the general population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037121302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1156
DO - 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1156
M3 - Article
C2 - 12433768
SN - 1468-5833
SN - 1756-1833
VL - 325
SP - 1156
EP - 1158
JO - British Medical Journal
JF - British Medical Journal
IS - 7373
ER -