Preliminary findings on the reliability and validity of the Cantonese Birmingham Cognitive Screen in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Authors

  • Xiaoping Pan
  • Haobo Chen
  • Johnny King Lam Lau
  • Anthony Pak Hin Kong
  • Aihua Guo
  • Jianxi Hu
  • Glyn W Humphreys

External organisations

  • Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China ; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • University of Oxford

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no currently effective cognitive assessment tools for patients who have suffered stroke in the People's Republic of China. The Birmingham Cognitive Screen (BCoS) has been shown to be a promising tool for revealing patients' poststroke cognitive deficits in specific domains, which facilitates more individually designed rehabilitation in the long run. Hence we examined the reliability and validity of a Cantonese version BCoS in patients with acute ischemic stroke, in Guangzhou.

METHOD: A total of 98 patients with acute ischemic stroke were assessed with the Cantonese version of the BCoS, and an additional 133 healthy individuals were recruited as controls. Apart from the BCoS, the patients also completed a number of external cognitive tests, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Albert's cancellation test, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test, and six gesture matching tasks. Cutoff scores for failing each subtest, ie, deficits, were computed based on the performance of the controls. The validity and reliability of the Cantonese BCoS were examined, as well as interrater and test-retest reliability. We also compared the proportions of cases being classified as deficits in controlled attention, memory, character writing, and praxis, between patients with and without spoken language impairment.

RESULTS: Analyses showed high test-retest reliability and agreement across independent raters on the qualitative aspects of measurement. Significant correlations were observed between the subtests of the Cantonese BCoS and the other external cognitive tests, providing evidence for convergent validity of the Cantonese BCoS. The screen was also able to generate measures of cognitive functions that were relatively uncontaminated by the presence of aphasia.

CONCLUSION: This study suggests good reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of the BCoS. The Cantonese BCoS is a very promising tool for the detection of cognitive problems in Cantonese speakers.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2377-90
Number of pages14
JournalNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Volume11
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Journal Article