Platelet rich plasma injection for acute Achilles tendon rupture: PATH-2 randomised, placebo controlled, superiority trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

  • David Keene
  • Joseph Alsousou
  • Philippa Hulley
  • Susan Wagland
  • Scott Parsons
  • Jacqueline Thompson
  • Heather O'Connor
  • Michael Maia Schlussel
  • Susan Dutton
  • Sarah Lamb
  • Keith Willett

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • Nuffield Departments of Orthopaedic Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
  • University of Liverpool

Abstract

Objective:
To determine whether an injection of platelet rich plasma improves outcomes after acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Design:
Randomised, placebo controlled, two arm, parallel group, participant and assessor masked, superiority trial.

Setting:
Secondary care trauma units across 19 hospitals in the United Kingdom’s health service.

Participants:
Recruitment commenced in July 2015 and follow-up was completed in March 2018. 230 adults aged 18 years and over were included, with acute Achilles tendon rupture presenting within 12 days of injury and managed with non-surgical treatment. Exclusions were injury at the insertion or musculotendinous junction, major leg injury or deformity, diabetes mellitus, platelet or haematological disorder, systemic corticosteroids, anticoagulation treatment, and other contraindicating conditions.

Interventions:
Participants were randomised 1:1 to platelet rich plasma (n=114) or placebo (dry needle; n=116) injection. All participants received standard rehabilitation care (ankle immobilisation followed by physiotherapy).

Main outcomes and measures:
Primary outcome was muscle tendon function at 24 weeks, measured objectively with the limb symmetry index (injured/uninjured×100) in maximal work done during the heel rise endurance test (an instrumented measure of repeated single leg heel rises until fatigue). Secondary outcomes included patient reported function (Achilles tendon rupture score), quality of life (short form 12 version 2®), pain (visual analogue scale), goal attainment (patient specific functional scale), and adverse events. A central laboratory analysed the quality and content of platelet rich plasma. Analyses were by modified intention to treat.

Results:
Participants were 46 years old on average, and 57 (25%) of 230 were female. At 24 weeks, 202 (88%) participants completed the heel rise endurance test and 216 (94%) the patient reported outcomes. The platelet rich plasma was of good quality, with expected growth factor content. No difference was detected in muscle tendon function between participants receiving platelet rich plasma injections and those receiving placebo injections (limb symmetry index, mean 34.7% (standard deviation 17.7%) v 38.5% (22.8%); adjusted mean difference −3.9% (95% confidence interval −10.5% to 2.7%)) or in any secondary outcomes or adverse event rates. Complier average causal effect analyses gave similar findings.

Conclusions:
There is no evidence to indicate that injections of platelet rich plasma can improve objective muscle tendon function, patient reported function, or quality of life after acute Achilles tendon rupture compared with placebo, or that they offer any patient benefit.

Bibliographic note

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numberl6132
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume367
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Achilles Tendon/injuries, Adult, Conservative Treatment/methods, Female, Humans, Injections/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Quality of Life, Recovery of Function, Tendon Injuries/diagnosis, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom