Phenomenological Evidence For Two Types of Paranoia

P Chadwick, Peter Trower, TM Juusti-Butler, N Maguire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Two types of paranoia have been identified, namely persecution (or 'Poor Me') paranoia, and punishment (or 'Bad Me') paranoia. This research tests predicted differences in phenomenology--specifically, in person evaluative beliefs, self-esteem, depression, anxiety, and anger. METHOD: Fifty-three people with current paranoid beliefs were classified as Poor Me, Bad Me, or neither (classification was reliable). Key dependent variables were measured. RESULTS: All predictions were supported, except the one relating to anger, where the two groups did not differ. The Bad Me group had lower self-esteem, more negative self-evaluative thinking, lower negative evaluations about others, higher depression and anxiety. Importantly, the differences in self-esteem and self-evaluations were not fully accounted for by differences in depression. CONCLUSION: Data support the presence of two distinct topographies of paranoia. Future research is needed to explore the theory further and examine clinical implications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-333
Number of pages7
JournalPsychopathology
Volume38
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phenomenological Evidence For Two Types of Paranoia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this