Moral Judgements in Social Dilemmas: How Bad is Free Riding?

R Cubitt, Michalis Drouvelis, S Gaechter, R Kabalin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last thirty years, economists and other social scientists have investigated people's normative views on distributive justice. Here we study people's normative views in social dilemmas, which underlie many situations of economic and social significance. Using insights from moral philosophy and psychology we provide an analysis of the morality of free riding. We use experimental survey methods to investigate people's moral judgments empirically. We vary others' contributions, the framing (“give-some” versus “take-some”) and whether contributions are simultaneous or sequential. We find that moral judgments of a free rider depend strongly on others' behaviour; and that failing to give is condemned more strongly than withdrawing all support.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-264
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Public Economics
Volume95
Issue number3-4
Early online date4 Nov 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moral Judgements in Social Dilemmas: How Bad is Free Riding?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this