Moral education and the justification of basic moral standards: replies to Clayton, Stevens and D’Olimpio

Michael Hand

doi:10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704

Moral education and the justification of basic moral standards: replies to Clayton, Stevens and D’Olimpio

Michael Hand

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

183 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Matthew Clayton, David Stevens and Laura D’Olimpio have advanced a series of objections to arguments I set out in my recent book A Theory of Moral Education – in particular to the problem-of-sociality justification for basic moral standards. Here I reply to their objections.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	529-539
Number of pages	11
Journal	Journal of Moral Education
Volume	48
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704
Publication status	Published - 10 Oct 2019

Keywords

Contractarianism
Indoctrination
Moral education
Moral standards
Problem of sociality
Reasonable disagreement
Rough equality
Virtue

Access to Document

10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704Licence: None: All rights reserved

Michael_Hand_Moral_education_and_the_justification_of_basic_moral_standards_replies_Journal_of_Moral_Education_2019
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Moral Education on 10.10.19, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704
Accepted author manuscript, 194 KBLicence: Other (please specify with Rights Statement)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704Licence: None: All rights reserved

Cite this

@article{4385ba92e4514fb88d9e0b1745295620,

title = "Moral education and the justification of basic moral standards: replies to Clayton, Stevens and D{\textquoteright}Olimpio",

abstract = "Matthew Clayton, David Stevens and Laura D{\textquoteright}Olimpio have advanced a series of objections to arguments I set out in my recent book A Theory of Moral Education – in particular to the problem-of-sociality justification for basic moral standards. Here I reply to their objections. ",

keywords = "Contractarianism, Indoctrination, Moral education, Moral standards, Problem of sociality, Reasonable disagreement, Rough equality, Virtue",

author = "Michael Hand",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "529--539",

journal = "Journal of Moral Education",

issn = "0305-7240",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral education and the justification of basic moral standards

T2 - replies to Clayton, Stevens and D’Olimpio

AU - Hand, Michael

PY - 2019/10/10

Y1 - 2019/10/10

N2 - Matthew Clayton, David Stevens and Laura D’Olimpio have advanced a series of objections to arguments I set out in my recent book A Theory of Moral Education – in particular to the problem-of-sociality justification for basic moral standards. Here I reply to their objections.

AB - Matthew Clayton, David Stevens and Laura D’Olimpio have advanced a series of objections to arguments I set out in my recent book A Theory of Moral Education – in particular to the problem-of-sociality justification for basic moral standards. Here I reply to their objections.

KW - Contractarianism

KW - Indoctrination

KW - Moral education

KW - Moral standards

KW - Problem of sociality

KW - Reasonable disagreement

KW - Rough equality

KW - Virtue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073515551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704

DO - 10.1080/03057240.2019.1626704

M3 - Article

SN - 0305-7240

VL - 48

SP - 529

EP - 539

JO - Journal of Moral Education

JF - Journal of Moral Education

IS - 4

ER -

Moral education and the justification of basic moral standards: replies to Clayton, Stevens and D’Olimpio

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this