Material Misstatement of What? A Comment on Smieliauskas et al., 'A Proposal to Replace "True and Fair View" with "Acceptable Risk of Material Misstatement" '

David Alexander

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This comment explores theoretical and practical aspects of the Smieliauskas et al. (2008), 'A Proposal to Replace "True and Fair View" With "Acceptable Risk of Material Misstatement", and develops the ideas outlined there. It is argued that these proposals are helpful, but theoretically incomplete. Theoretical developments relating to accounting aspects are offered, and proposed for others to take further. The pragmatic implications suggest difficulties in the operationalization of the ideas of the original paper in a world of multiple and inconsistent user needs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)447-454
    Number of pages8
    JournalAbacus
    Volume46
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2010

    Keywords

    • Material misstatement
    • Risk reporting
    • True and fair view

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Material Misstatement of What? A Comment on Smieliauskas et al., 'A Proposal to Replace "True and Fair View" with "Acceptable Risk of Material Misstatement" ''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this