Long-Term Function After Restorative Proctocolectomy

JMD Wheeler, Amitava Banerjee, N Ahuja, DP Jewell, NJM Mortensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE Early functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy and formation of an ileoanal pouch is known to be good, but there are minimal data on the long-term function of the pouch. The aim of this study was to look at the long-term functional outcome in patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy and formation of an ileoanal pouch. METHODS A total of 151 consecutive patients (96 males, 55 females) who underwent ileoanal pouch surgery between April 1983 and May 1993 were identified. Functional outcomes from the previous 12 months were appraised by a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS The median age at surgery was 31 years (range, 6-63 years), with a median follow-up of 142 months (range, 100-221 months). Eighteen patients have had their pouches excised, with another patient being defunctioned. Therefore 19 patients (13 percent) had suffered pouch failure. Altogether, 115 patients were available for follow-up, and 98 patients (85 percent) returned questionnaires. The median pouch-emptying frequency was five times (range, 1-17) during the day and one time (range, 0-6) at night. A total of 74 percent of patients had perfect continence during the day. Most of the patients had no life-style restrictions related to the pouch, and 98 percent of patients would recommend a pouch to others. CONCLUSIONS Long-term functional outcome after ileoanal pouch surgery is good in most patients. For patients requiring proctocolectomy, ileoanal pouch surgery can now be recommended as an excellent long-term option.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)946-951
Number of pages6
JournalDiseases of the Colon & Rectum
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Function After Restorative Proctocolectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this