Let’s talk: parents’ mental talk (not mind-mindedness or mindreading capacity) predicts children’s false belief understanding

R.T. Devine, Claire Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
546 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While one might expect parents’ mind-mindedness (MM; the propensity to view children as mental agents) to relate to everyday mental-state talk (MST) and theory-of-mind capacity, evidence to support this view is lacking. In addition, both the uniqueness and the specificity of relations between parental MM, parental MST and children’s false belief understanding (FBU) are open to question. To address these three gaps, this study tracked 117 preschoolers (60 boys) and their parents across a 13-month period (Mage = 3.94 years, SD = 0.53, at Time 1). Parental MM, MST and theory-of-mind capacity showed little overlap. Both MM and MST were weakly associated with children’s concurrent FBU, but, in line with social constructivist accounts, only MST predicted later FBU.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1236-1253
Number of pages18
JournalChild Development
Volume90
Issue number4
Early online date8 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Let’s talk: parents’ mental talk (not mind-mindedness or mindreading capacity) predicts children’s false belief understanding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this