Knowing me, knowing you: inter-professional working between general practice and social care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Knowing me, knowing you : inter-professional working between general practice and social care. / Mangan, Catherine; Miller, Robin; Ward, Carol.

In: Journal of Integrated Care, Vol. 23, No. 2, 20.04.2015, p. 62-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{b272a7183e234f9a87af12086ee8f35e,
title = "Knowing me, knowing you: inter-professional working between general practice and social care",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings of the first stage of a project seeking to improve interprofessional working between general practice and adult social care teams. It develops the current evidence base through findings from focus groups and reflects on the implications of the findings for interprofessional collaboration.Design/methodology/approach– The project involved running seven focus groups with general practice staff and adult social work teams to explore their perceptions and understanding of each other.Findings– The focus groups highlighted that the negative aspects of interprofessional working outweighed the positives. Negatives included perceptions of different value bases, a lack of knowledge about each others{\textquoteright} roles and responsibilities which resulted in resorting to stereotypes, poor interprofessional communication and a sense of an unspoken professional hierarchy with general practitioners (GPs) at the top leading preventing a culture of appropriate challenge.Research limitations/implications– The research has only been conducted with four GP practices and three social work teams that had expressed an interest in improving their interprofessional working. Therefore the findings may not be generalisable.Practical implications– The case study suggests that there is a lack of effective interprofessional working between social care teams and general practice. With the current health and social care agenda focused on integration, this suggests there should be a greater focus on this area.Originality/value– This paper illustrates that despite many years of policy makers promoting better integration, the quality of the interprofessional collaboration between social care teams and general practice remains poor.",
keywords = "integration, adult social care, integrated health and social care, health and social care, Multi-disciplinary teamwork, inteagency working ",
author = "Catherine Mangan and Robin Miller and Carol Ward",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1108/JICA-02-2015-0010",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "62--73",
journal = "Journal of Integrated Care",
issn = "1476-9018",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowing me, knowing you

T2 - inter-professional working between general practice and social care

AU - Mangan, Catherine

AU - Miller, Robin

AU - Ward, Carol

PY - 2015/4/20

Y1 - 2015/4/20

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings of the first stage of a project seeking to improve interprofessional working between general practice and adult social care teams. It develops the current evidence base through findings from focus groups and reflects on the implications of the findings for interprofessional collaboration.Design/methodology/approach– The project involved running seven focus groups with general practice staff and adult social work teams to explore their perceptions and understanding of each other.Findings– The focus groups highlighted that the negative aspects of interprofessional working outweighed the positives. Negatives included perceptions of different value bases, a lack of knowledge about each others’ roles and responsibilities which resulted in resorting to stereotypes, poor interprofessional communication and a sense of an unspoken professional hierarchy with general practitioners (GPs) at the top leading preventing a culture of appropriate challenge.Research limitations/implications– The research has only been conducted with four GP practices and three social work teams that had expressed an interest in improving their interprofessional working. Therefore the findings may not be generalisable.Practical implications– The case study suggests that there is a lack of effective interprofessional working between social care teams and general practice. With the current health and social care agenda focused on integration, this suggests there should be a greater focus on this area.Originality/value– This paper illustrates that despite many years of policy makers promoting better integration, the quality of the interprofessional collaboration between social care teams and general practice remains poor.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings of the first stage of a project seeking to improve interprofessional working between general practice and adult social care teams. It develops the current evidence base through findings from focus groups and reflects on the implications of the findings for interprofessional collaboration.Design/methodology/approach– The project involved running seven focus groups with general practice staff and adult social work teams to explore their perceptions and understanding of each other.Findings– The focus groups highlighted that the negative aspects of interprofessional working outweighed the positives. Negatives included perceptions of different value bases, a lack of knowledge about each others’ roles and responsibilities which resulted in resorting to stereotypes, poor interprofessional communication and a sense of an unspoken professional hierarchy with general practitioners (GPs) at the top leading preventing a culture of appropriate challenge.Research limitations/implications– The research has only been conducted with four GP practices and three social work teams that had expressed an interest in improving their interprofessional working. Therefore the findings may not be generalisable.Practical implications– The case study suggests that there is a lack of effective interprofessional working between social care teams and general practice. With the current health and social care agenda focused on integration, this suggests there should be a greater focus on this area.Originality/value– This paper illustrates that despite many years of policy makers promoting better integration, the quality of the interprofessional collaboration between social care teams and general practice remains poor.

KW - integration

KW - adult social care

KW - integrated health and social care

KW - health and social care

KW - Multi-disciplinary teamwork

KW - inteagency working

U2 - 10.1108/JICA-02-2015-0010

DO - 10.1108/JICA-02-2015-0010

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 62

EP - 73

JO - Journal of Integrated Care

JF - Journal of Integrated Care

SN - 1476-9018

IS - 2

ER -