Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search

Jason Braithwaite, Johan Hulleman, DG Watson, Glyn Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Visual search can be facilitated when participants receive a preview of half the distractors (the preview benefit in search; Watson & Humphreys, 1997). Donk and Theeuwes (2001) have argued that preview-based benefits are abolished if the display items are isoluminant to a background. This is consistent with the preview benefit being due to onset capture by the new stimuli. In contrast, the present experiments challenge this suggestion and show that preview benefits can occur under isoluminant conditions, providing that they are given enough time to occur. In Experiment 1, we showed that a preview benefit can occur even with isoluminant stimuli, provided that the old items are previewed for a sufficient time. In Experiment 2, we tested and rejected the idea that this advantage is due to low-level sensory fatigue for the preview stimuli. These findings indicate that the preview effect is not caused solely by onset capture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-300
Number of pages11
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume68
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this