Involving service users and carers in admissions for courses in social work and clinical psychology: a cross disciplinary comparison of practices at the University of Brimingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{1b26aa23b16c4564affc577c8d66ca46,
title = "Involving service users and carers in admissions for courses in social work and clinical psychology: a cross disciplinary comparison of practices at the University of Brimingham",
abstract = "Rationales for involving service users and carers in professional health and social work education tend to derive from arguments of empowerment, consumer rights and/or improvement in service outcomes. In the UK, these rationales are now firmly embedded, and involvement is increasingly expected in all aspects of training, but little literature exists describing or evaluating the impact of involvement outside teaching activities. This paper describes the approach to involvement in admissions interviews in the social work and clinical psychology programmes at the University of Birmingham. It reports the results of a post hoc survey into the experiences and expectations of the 2007-08 cohorts of successful applicants and interview-panel members from each programme, with the aims of highlighting underlying rationales and informing future practice. Survey respondents tended to focus on outcome-based rationales rather than value-based ones in support of involvement. Impact on the selection process was cited by many as important, but service user and carer visibility to applicants may be a more significant outcome. Disagreements among panel members were uncommon, but did raise some training and procedural issues. To be meaningful, the rationale(s) for involvement should be clearly articulated at the outset and the mode(s) of involvement should reflect this.",
keywords = "Social work education, clinical psychology education, carers, service users",
author = "Elizabeth Matka and D River and Rosemary Littlechild and Theresa Powell",
year = "2009",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcp142",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "2137--2154",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involving service users and carers in admissions for courses in social work and clinical psychology: a cross disciplinary comparison of practices at the University of Brimingham

AU - Matka, Elizabeth

AU - River, D

AU - Littlechild, Rosemary

AU - Powell, Theresa

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Rationales for involving service users and carers in professional health and social work education tend to derive from arguments of empowerment, consumer rights and/or improvement in service outcomes. In the UK, these rationales are now firmly embedded, and involvement is increasingly expected in all aspects of training, but little literature exists describing or evaluating the impact of involvement outside teaching activities. This paper describes the approach to involvement in admissions interviews in the social work and clinical psychology programmes at the University of Birmingham. It reports the results of a post hoc survey into the experiences and expectations of the 2007-08 cohorts of successful applicants and interview-panel members from each programme, with the aims of highlighting underlying rationales and informing future practice. Survey respondents tended to focus on outcome-based rationales rather than value-based ones in support of involvement. Impact on the selection process was cited by many as important, but service user and carer visibility to applicants may be a more significant outcome. Disagreements among panel members were uncommon, but did raise some training and procedural issues. To be meaningful, the rationale(s) for involvement should be clearly articulated at the outset and the mode(s) of involvement should reflect this.

AB - Rationales for involving service users and carers in professional health and social work education tend to derive from arguments of empowerment, consumer rights and/or improvement in service outcomes. In the UK, these rationales are now firmly embedded, and involvement is increasingly expected in all aspects of training, but little literature exists describing or evaluating the impact of involvement outside teaching activities. This paper describes the approach to involvement in admissions interviews in the social work and clinical psychology programmes at the University of Birmingham. It reports the results of a post hoc survey into the experiences and expectations of the 2007-08 cohorts of successful applicants and interview-panel members from each programme, with the aims of highlighting underlying rationales and informing future practice. Survey respondents tended to focus on outcome-based rationales rather than value-based ones in support of involvement. Impact on the selection process was cited by many as important, but service user and carer visibility to applicants may be a more significant outcome. Disagreements among panel members were uncommon, but did raise some training and procedural issues. To be meaningful, the rationale(s) for involvement should be clearly articulated at the outset and the mode(s) of involvement should reflect this.

KW - Social work education

KW - clinical psychology education

KW - carers

KW - service users

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcp142

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcp142

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 2137

EP - 2154

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 7

ER -