Investigating the Causal Mechanisms of Symptom Recovery in Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders Using Bayesian Networks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

  • Marco Scutari
  • Anneli Peolsson
  • Gunnel Peterson
  • Maria L Ludvigsson

External organisations

  • Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Department of Statistics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
  • Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping.
  • Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
  • Rehab Väst, County Council of Östergötland, Department of Rehabilitation and Department of Medical and Health, Sweden.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study's objective was to understand the causal mechanisms underpinning the recovery of individuals with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). We applied Bayesian Networks (BN) to answer 2 study aims: (1) to identify the causal mechanism(s) of recovery underpinning neck-specific exercise (NSE), and (2) quantify if the cyclical pathway of the fear-avoidance model (FAM) is supported by the present data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort data set of 216 individuals with chronic WAD. Fifteen variables were used to build a BN model: treatment group (NSE with or without a behavioral approach, or general physical activity), muscle endurance, range of motion, hand strength, neck proprioception, pain catastrophizing, fear, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, perceived work ability, disability, pain intensity, sex, and follow-up time.

RESULTS: The BN model showed that neck pain reduction rate was greater after NSE compared with physical activity prescription (β=0.59 points per month [P<0.001]) only in the presence of 2 mediators: global neck muscle endurance and perceived work ability. We also found the following pathway of variables that constituted the FAM: anxiety, followed by depressive symptoms, fear, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and consequently pain.

CONCLUSIONS: We uncovered 2 mediators that explained the mechanisms of effect behind NSE, and proposed an alternative FAM pathway. The present study is the first to apply BN modelling to understand the causal mechanisms of recovery in WAD. In doing so, it is anticipated that such analytical methods could increase the precision of treatment of individuals with chronic WAD.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-655
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Journal of Pain
Volume35
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2019