Introduction

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Standard

Introduction. / Suikkanen, Jussi.

Methodology and moral philosophy. ed. / Jussi Suikkanen; Antti Kauppinen. Routledge, 2018. p. 1-21.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Suikkanen, J 2018, Introduction. in J Suikkanen & A Kauppinen (eds), Methodology and moral philosophy. Routledge, pp. 1-21.

APA

Suikkanen, J. (2018). Introduction. In J. Suikkanen, & A. Kauppinen (Eds.), Methodology and moral philosophy (pp. 1-21). Routledge.

Vancouver

Suikkanen J. Introduction. In Suikkanen J, Kauppinen A, editors, Methodology and moral philosophy. Routledge. 2018. p. 1-21

Author

Suikkanen, Jussi. / Introduction. Methodology and moral philosophy. editor / Jussi Suikkanen ; Antti Kauppinen. Routledge, 2018. pp. 1-21

Bibtex

@inbook{77270a5ad8d648b694cd8b76eff5c579,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "This chapter begins by explaining two widespread attitudes towards the methods of moral philosophy. The first common attitude is that the appropriate method for doing ethics was described by John Rawls when he formulated the reflective equilibrium method. Another common attitude is that moral philosophy has no method – anything goes in ethical theorising as long as the results are significant enough. The chapter then motivates the volume by arguing that these attitudes are not helpful. The reflective equilibrium method has its limits and yet not all ways of proceeding in ethics are equally good. For this reason, I argue that we need to be more aware of the argumentative strategies we employ in ethics. This requires being methodologically reflective and transparent and taking part in the debates about the merits and problems of different methodologies exactly in the way done in the chapters of this volume. The second half of the chapter then provides an outline of the other chapters. Here I focus on clarifying exactly how these chapters contribute to the new discussions about the methods of ethics",
author = "Jussi Suikkanen",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138322097",
pages = "1--21",
editor = "Jussi Suikkanen and Antti Kauppinen",
booktitle = "Methodology and moral philosophy",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - Suikkanen, Jussi

PY - 2018/11/7

Y1 - 2018/11/7

N2 - This chapter begins by explaining two widespread attitudes towards the methods of moral philosophy. The first common attitude is that the appropriate method for doing ethics was described by John Rawls when he formulated the reflective equilibrium method. Another common attitude is that moral philosophy has no method – anything goes in ethical theorising as long as the results are significant enough. The chapter then motivates the volume by arguing that these attitudes are not helpful. The reflective equilibrium method has its limits and yet not all ways of proceeding in ethics are equally good. For this reason, I argue that we need to be more aware of the argumentative strategies we employ in ethics. This requires being methodologically reflective and transparent and taking part in the debates about the merits and problems of different methodologies exactly in the way done in the chapters of this volume. The second half of the chapter then provides an outline of the other chapters. Here I focus on clarifying exactly how these chapters contribute to the new discussions about the methods of ethics

AB - This chapter begins by explaining two widespread attitudes towards the methods of moral philosophy. The first common attitude is that the appropriate method for doing ethics was described by John Rawls when he formulated the reflective equilibrium method. Another common attitude is that moral philosophy has no method – anything goes in ethical theorising as long as the results are significant enough. The chapter then motivates the volume by arguing that these attitudes are not helpful. The reflective equilibrium method has its limits and yet not all ways of proceeding in ethics are equally good. For this reason, I argue that we need to be more aware of the argumentative strategies we employ in ethics. This requires being methodologically reflective and transparent and taking part in the debates about the merits and problems of different methodologies exactly in the way done in the chapters of this volume. The second half of the chapter then provides an outline of the other chapters. Here I focus on clarifying exactly how these chapters contribute to the new discussions about the methods of ethics

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781138322097

SN - 1138322091

SP - 1

EP - 21

BT - Methodology and moral philosophy

A2 - Suikkanen, Jussi

A2 - Kauppinen, Antti

PB - Routledge

ER -