In vitro evaluation of five rapid antigen detection tests for group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal sore throat infections

GM Lasseter, CAM McNulty, Frederick Hobbs, D Mant, P Little

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ease of use and in vitro accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the five most commonly used RADTs in Europe (OSOM Ultra, Quickvue Dipstick, Streptatest, Clearview Exact Strep A and IMI Test Pack). Methods. To ensure the RADTs were evaluated objectively, a standardized in vitro method using known concentrations of GABHS was used to remove the inherent biases associated with clinical studies. Results. The IMI Test Pack was the easiest RADT to use overall. The ability to detect all positive GABHS (sensitivity) varied considerably between kits from 95% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88-98%], for the IMI Test Pack and OSOM, to 62% (95% CI: 51-72%) for Clearview, at the highest GABHS concentration. None of the RADTs gave any false-positive results with commensal flora-they were 100% specific. Conclusions. The IMI Test Pack is most suitable for use in primary care, as it had high sensitivity, high specificity and was easy to use.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)437-444
    Number of pages8
    JournalFamily Practice
    Volume26
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009

    Keywords

    • infectious diseases
    • drug resistance
    • Diagnostic tests
    • public health
    • microbiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro evaluation of five rapid antigen detection tests for group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal sore throat infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this