Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Standard

Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. / Iacucci, Marietta; Cannatelli, Rosanna; Tontini, Gian Eugenio; Panaccione, Remo; Danese, Silvio; Fiorino, Gionata; Matsumoto , Takayuki; Kocchar, Gursimran S; Shen, Bo; Kiesslich, Ralf; Ghosh, Subrata.

In: The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 4, No. 12, 12.2019, p. 971-983.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Harvard

Iacucci, M, Cannatelli, R, Tontini, GE, Panaccione, R, Danese, S, Fiorino, G, Matsumoto , T, Kocchar, GS, Shen, B, Kiesslich, R & Ghosh, S 2019, 'Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease', The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 971-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30194-3

APA

Iacucci, M., Cannatelli, R., Tontini, G. E., Panaccione, R., Danese, S., Fiorino, G., Matsumoto , T., Kocchar, G. S., Shen, B., Kiesslich, R., & Ghosh, S. (2019). Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 4(12), 971-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30194-3

Vancouver

Author

Iacucci, Marietta ; Cannatelli, Rosanna ; Tontini, Gian Eugenio ; Panaccione, Remo ; Danese, Silvio ; Fiorino, Gionata ; Matsumoto , Takayuki ; Kocchar, Gursimran S ; Shen, Bo ; Kiesslich, Ralf ; Ghosh, Subrata. / Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. In: The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019 ; Vol. 4, No. 12. pp. 971-983.

Bibtex

@article{71330031d57e4419ba4b317123d8b7c0,
title = "Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease",
abstract = "Several recommendations have addressed the topic of improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, there is variation between these recommendations, in part due to the absence of well-defined quality indicators, suggesting that these quality indicators should be studied and developed. We did a systematic review of evidence related to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease to look at the different variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during, and after the procedure. We identified several key quality measures that could be adopted in clinical practice, including control of inflammation, optimal bowel preparation, ideal time allocation, training, sedation, detection and characterisation of lesions, therapeutic management of the lesions, and colonoscopic reports. However, further primary research and consensus reports are needed to continue developing roadmaps at a global level.",
author = "Marietta Iacucci and Rosanna Cannatelli and Tontini, {Gian Eugenio} and Remo Panaccione and Silvio Danese and Gionata Fiorino and Takayuki Matsumoto and Kocchar, {Gursimran S} and Bo Shen and Ralf Kiesslich and Subrata Ghosh",
year = "2019",
month = dec
doi = "10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30194-3",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "971--983",
journal = "The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "2468-1253",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

AU - Iacucci, Marietta

AU - Cannatelli, Rosanna

AU - Tontini, Gian Eugenio

AU - Panaccione, Remo

AU - Danese, Silvio

AU - Fiorino, Gionata

AU - Matsumoto , Takayuki

AU - Kocchar, Gursimran S

AU - Shen, Bo

AU - Kiesslich, Ralf

AU - Ghosh, Subrata

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Several recommendations have addressed the topic of improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, there is variation between these recommendations, in part due to the absence of well-defined quality indicators, suggesting that these quality indicators should be studied and developed. We did a systematic review of evidence related to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease to look at the different variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during, and after the procedure. We identified several key quality measures that could be adopted in clinical practice, including control of inflammation, optimal bowel preparation, ideal time allocation, training, sedation, detection and characterisation of lesions, therapeutic management of the lesions, and colonoscopic reports. However, further primary research and consensus reports are needed to continue developing roadmaps at a global level.

AB - Several recommendations have addressed the topic of improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, there is variation between these recommendations, in part due to the absence of well-defined quality indicators, suggesting that these quality indicators should be studied and developed. We did a systematic review of evidence related to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease to look at the different variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during, and after the procedure. We identified several key quality measures that could be adopted in clinical practice, including control of inflammation, optimal bowel preparation, ideal time allocation, training, sedation, detection and characterisation of lesions, therapeutic management of the lesions, and colonoscopic reports. However, further primary research and consensus reports are needed to continue developing roadmaps at a global level.

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696831

U2 - 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30194-3

DO - 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30194-3

M3 - Review article

VL - 4

SP - 971

EP - 983

JO - The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 2468-1253

IS - 12

ER -