Identifying a basket of surgical procedures to standardize global surgical metrics: an international Delphi study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Authors

  • Dmitri Nepogodiev
  • Janet Martin
  • Abebe Bekele
  • Dhruva Ghosh
  • Adesoji O. Ademuyiwa
  • Thomas G Weiser

External organisations

  • University of Western Ontario

Abstract

Objective:
We aimed to define a globally applicable list of surgical procedures, or “basket”, which could represent a health system´s capacity to provide surgical care and standardize global surgical measurement.

Summary of background data:
Six indicators have been proposed to assess access to safe, affordable, timely surgical and anesthesia care, with a focus on laparotomy, caesarean section, and treatment of open fracture. However, comparability, particularly for these procedures, has been limited by a lack of definitional clarity and their overly broad scope.

Methods:
We conducted a three round international expert Delphi exercise between April and June 2019 using REDCap® to identify a set of procedures representative of surgical capacity. To be included, procedures had to be important for treating common conditions, well-defined, and impactful (i.e. well-recognized clinical or functional benefit). Procedures were eliminated or prioritized in each round, and those noted as “extremely” or “very important” by 50% of respondents in round 3 were included in the final “basket”.

Results
Altogether 331 respondents from 78 countries participated in the Delphi process. A final basket of 32 procedures representing diseases categories in trauma, cancer, congenital anomalies, maternal/reproductive health, aging, and infection were identified as important for inclusion to assess surgical capacity.
Conclusions
This surgical basket could allow a more standardized assessment of a country´s surgical system. Further testing and refinement will likely be needed, but this basket can be used immediately to guide ongoing monitoring and evaluation of global surgery capacities to improve and strengthen surgery and anesthesia care.

Bibliographic note

There was no specific funding for this study. DN, DM, DG and AA are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit Grant (NIHR 16.136.79). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
JournalAnnals of surgery
VolumePublish Ahead of Print
Issue number00
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2020