How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard

How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate. / Roberts, Joseph T F.

In: HEC Forum, 03.06.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Roberts, JTF 2020, 'How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate', HEC Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7

APA

Roberts, J. T. F. (2020). How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate. HEC Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7

Vancouver

Roberts JTF. How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate. HEC Forum. 2020 Jun 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7

Author

Roberts, Joseph T F. / How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate. In: HEC Forum. 2020.

Bibtex

@article{b4ec151093b446f8b6ea4d6dd1f3017d,
title = "How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate",
abstract = "In Pharmaceutical Freedom Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people's right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan's Pharmaceutical Freedom leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan's account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence.",
keywords = "Competence, Harm reduction, Pharmaceutical, Regulation, Selfmedication",
author = "Roberts, {Joseph T F}",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7",
language = "English",
journal = "HEC Forum",
issn = "0956-2737",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate

AU - Roberts, Joseph T F

PY - 2020/6/3

Y1 - 2020/6/3

N2 - In Pharmaceutical Freedom Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people's right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan's Pharmaceutical Freedom leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan's account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence.

AB - In Pharmaceutical Freedom Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people's right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan's Pharmaceutical Freedom leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan's account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence.

KW - Competence

KW - Harm reduction

KW - Pharmaceutical

KW - Regulation

KW - Selfmedication

U2 - 10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7

DO - 10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 32494992

JO - HEC Forum

JF - HEC Forum

SN - 0956-2737

ER -