How to interpret randomised trials of test-treatment combinations: a critical evaluation of research on uterine Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia

Caroline Fox, Khalid Khan, Aravinthan Coomarasamy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The methodology to evaluate either a test or treatment is well developed and understood. However, the design, conduct and interpretation of a combination of a test and a treatment in a single study are fraught with complexities. There are two distinct study designs to evaluate test-treatment combinations, with randomisation occurring either before or after the test. We present critical issues that need to be considered when evaluating and appraising test-treatment combinations, using the example of research on the uterine artery Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)801-808
Number of pages8
JournalBJOG
Volume117
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2010

Keywords

  • aspirin
  • pre-eclampsia
  • uterine artery doppler
  • test-treatment combinations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to interpret randomised trials of test-treatment combinations: a critical evaluation of research on uterine Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this