Governing through prevent? Regulation and contested practice in state–Muslim engagement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

  • Therese O'Toole
  • Nasar Meer
  • Daniel Nilsson DeHanas
  • Stephen Jones
  • Tariq Modood

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • University of Bristol
  • Univ Strathclyde
  • King's College London

Abstract

In this article, we consider the implications of the ‘Prevent’ strand of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy for the UK state’s engagement with Muslims. We argue that the logics of Prevent have been highly problematic for state–Muslim engagement. Nevertheless, we suggest that the characterisation of state approaches to engaging Muslims as a form of discipline is incomplete without an analysis of: first, differences in practices, habits and perspectives across governance domains; second, variations in approach and implementation between levels of governance; and third, the agency of Muslims who engage with the state. Through this approach we show how attention to the situated practices of governance reveals the contested nature of governing through Prevent.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-177
Number of pages18
JournalSociology
Volume50
Issue number1
Early online date20 Feb 2015
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • counter-terrorism, Muslims, participatory governance, Prevent