Governance pressures and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management – An empirical analysis of UK manufacturing industry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{07a6e3ededd44790b97e18b65a4f5c9d,
title = "Governance pressures and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management – An empirical analysis of UK manufacturing industry",
abstract = "Although sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has recently received increasing attention among UK manufacturing firms, there is a concern as to whether SSCM practices are being implemented because they are profitable or only because of governance coercive pressure. Thus, the aims of this paper are twofold: first, determining the role of governance in the adoption of SSCM practices; second, investigating whether SSCM practices can be both environmentally beneficial and commercially viable. In light of these issues, this paper develops and empirically assesses an integrated model of governance pressures-SSCM practices-performance. Data was collected from 146 UK manufacturing managers, and analysed using the structural equation modelling method. Exogenous driving forces of governance were found to be precursors to the successful implementation of SSCM practices. The empirical results further suggest that while the implementation of sustainable supply chain management has a positive effect on environmental performance, it does not necessarily lead to improved economic performance, as only sustainable procurement was found to have a positive effect on economic performance. This paper contributes to the literature by highlighting the role of governance in SSCM adoption and performance gains in environmental protection while economic performance is partially compromised. The results also provide useful insights for both managers seeking to adopt sustainable practices and policy-makers seeking to further promote sustainable supply chain.",
keywords = "Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), Coercive pressure, Manufacturing firms, Environmental performance, Economic performance, Structural equation modelling (SEM), UK",
author = "Ali Esfahbodi and Yufeng Zhang and Glyn Watson and Tao Zhang",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098",
language = "English",
volume = "155",
pages = "66--78",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Korea",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance pressures and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management – An empirical analysis of UK manufacturing industry

AU - Esfahbodi, Ali

AU - Zhang, Yufeng

AU - Watson, Glyn

AU - Zhang, Tao

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Although sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has recently received increasing attention among UK manufacturing firms, there is a concern as to whether SSCM practices are being implemented because they are profitable or only because of governance coercive pressure. Thus, the aims of this paper are twofold: first, determining the role of governance in the adoption of SSCM practices; second, investigating whether SSCM practices can be both environmentally beneficial and commercially viable. In light of these issues, this paper develops and empirically assesses an integrated model of governance pressures-SSCM practices-performance. Data was collected from 146 UK manufacturing managers, and analysed using the structural equation modelling method. Exogenous driving forces of governance were found to be precursors to the successful implementation of SSCM practices. The empirical results further suggest that while the implementation of sustainable supply chain management has a positive effect on environmental performance, it does not necessarily lead to improved economic performance, as only sustainable procurement was found to have a positive effect on economic performance. This paper contributes to the literature by highlighting the role of governance in SSCM adoption and performance gains in environmental protection while economic performance is partially compromised. The results also provide useful insights for both managers seeking to adopt sustainable practices and policy-makers seeking to further promote sustainable supply chain.

AB - Although sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has recently received increasing attention among UK manufacturing firms, there is a concern as to whether SSCM practices are being implemented because they are profitable or only because of governance coercive pressure. Thus, the aims of this paper are twofold: first, determining the role of governance in the adoption of SSCM practices; second, investigating whether SSCM practices can be both environmentally beneficial and commercially viable. In light of these issues, this paper develops and empirically assesses an integrated model of governance pressures-SSCM practices-performance. Data was collected from 146 UK manufacturing managers, and analysed using the structural equation modelling method. Exogenous driving forces of governance were found to be precursors to the successful implementation of SSCM practices. The empirical results further suggest that while the implementation of sustainable supply chain management has a positive effect on environmental performance, it does not necessarily lead to improved economic performance, as only sustainable procurement was found to have a positive effect on economic performance. This paper contributes to the literature by highlighting the role of governance in SSCM adoption and performance gains in environmental protection while economic performance is partially compromised. The results also provide useful insights for both managers seeking to adopt sustainable practices and policy-makers seeking to further promote sustainable supply chain.

KW - Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM)

KW - Coercive pressure

KW - Manufacturing firms

KW - Environmental performance

KW - Economic performance

KW - Structural equation modelling (SEM)

KW - UK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 66

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -