Getting back in the DeLorean: modernisation vs anti-modernisation in contemporary British politics

Peter Kerr, Emma Foster, Alexander Oaten, Neema Begum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
755 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article highlights a growing clash between mainstream modernizing and populist anti-modernizing forces in the UK. Whilst scholarship on UK party politics has, for the past three decades, focussed on processes of party modernization, little attention has been paid to the countervailing processes of resistance towards modernization. This contrasts with comparative studies, which show that throughout much of Europe modernization processes have worked to produce populist backlashes from anti-modernizing forces seeking to reassert various types of traditional values and practices. Drawing on the comparative literature on modernization, our argument here is that a similar populist backlash against modernization is occurring across the political spectrum in the UK and has been a factor in: the rise of nationalism associated with UKIP and the SNP; the 2016 BREXIT vote and the efforts of both Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Conservative PM Theresa May to distance their parties from the legacies of their modernizing predecessors. Empirically, we show how this increasingly prevalent line of conflict is playing out in the UK, whilst theoretically we argue that a discourse theoretical approach can provide significant advantages over existing approaches for understanding the dynamic interplay between modernizing and anti-modernizing discourses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292 - 309
Number of pages17
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • modernization
  • anti-modernization
  • populism
  • Conservative Party
  • Labour Party
  • UKIP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Getting back in the DeLorean: modernisation vs anti-modernisation in contemporary British politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this