Fine-grained Concurrency with Separation Logic

K Kapoor, K Lodaya, Uday Reddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
295 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reasoning about concurrent programs involves representing the information that concurrent processes manipulate disjoint portions of memory. In sophisticated applications, the division of memory between processes is not static. Through operations, processes can exchange the implied ownership of memory cells. In addition, processes can also share ownership of cells in a controlled fashion as long as they perform operations that do not interfere, e.g., they can concurrently read shared cells. Thus the traditional paradigm of distributed computing based on locations is replaced by a paradigm of concurrent computing which is more tightly based on program structure. Concurrent Separation Logic with Permissions, developed by O'Hearn, Bornat et al., is able to represent sophisticated transfer of ownership and permissions between processes. We demonstrate how these ideas can be used to reason about fine-grained concurrent programs which do not employ explicit synchronization operations to control interference but cooperatively manipulate memory cells so that interference is avoided. Reasoning about such programs is challenging and appropriate logical tools are necessary to carry out the reasoning in a reliable fashion. We argue that Concurrent Separation Logic with Permissions provides such tools. We illustrate the logical techniques by presenting the proof of a concurrent garbage collector originally studied by Dijkstra et al., and extended by Lamport to handle multiple user processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-632
Number of pages50
JournalJournal of Philosophical Logic
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Separation logic
  • Concurrent programs
  • Garbage collection
  • Program correctness
  • Resource logics
  • Heap storage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fine-grained Concurrency with Separation Logic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this