Field intercomparison of filter pack and impactor sampling for aerosol nitrate, ammonium, and sulphate at coastal and inland sites

Z Huang, Roy Harrison, Andrew Allen, JD James, Robert Tilling, Jianxin Yin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    An intercomparison has been performed on the coarse (>2.5 mum) and fine fraction (0.1 ppbv(2)), significantly negative sampling artefacts are observed for both nitrate and ammonium concentrations obtained with the impactor relative to the filter pack. Nevertheless, it is shown that both filter pack and MOUDI are capable of collecting ammonium nitrate from polluted air masses although the absolute efficiency is unknown. From the measurements obtained with the MOUDI in summertime at both coastal and inland sites, it is observed that about 64% of collected particle nitrate is present in the coarse (> 2.5 mum) mode; but in wintertime, only about 29% of particle nitrate is found to reside in the coarse particles collected at the inland site. The lower efficiency of the MOUDI for ammonium nitrate relative to the Teflon filter is in marked contrast to the reported higher efficiency of the Berner impactor than the Teflon filter for sampling nitrate from polluted air. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)215-232
    Number of pages18
    JournalAtmospheric Research
    Volume71
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004

    Keywords

    • ammonium
    • sulphate
    • nitrate
    • MOUDI

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Field intercomparison of filter pack and impactor sampling for aerosol nitrate, ammonium, and sulphate at coastal and inland sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this