Exploring the impact of Research Governance in health and social care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Exploring the impact of Research Governance in health and social care. / Howarth, M; Kneafsey, Rosaleen.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 49, No. 6, 01.01.2005, p. 675-683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{d232d424cfa34867961c2ae6c84da492,
title = "Exploring the impact of Research Governance in health and social care",
abstract = "AIM: This paper reports a study exploring the impact and implementation of research governance in the North West region of England. BACKGROUND: In 2001, the UK Government launched a framework to ensure the governance of research within the National Health Service. Whilst this framework was undoubtedly geared towards improving the standards and practice of research, concerns have been raised in the academic literature about the potentially negative impact on future research. METHODS: A mixed method approach, using questionnaires (n = 350), semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a volunteer sample, was used to explore research staff perspectives about research governance. Survey data were analysed using Microsoft Excel, and a thematic analysis was used to elicit themes from the semi-structured interviews. The study lasted for 12 months and used a range of study sites, giving insight into potentially different experiences or approaches to implementing the research governance framework. FINDINGS: Questionnaire data revealed a good level of awareness about the Research Governance Framework. However, a range of concerns was also raised, such as the increased workload associated with the research governance application process and lack of transparency about the process. Five themes emerged from the focus groups: control, epistemology, organizational issues, impact on teaching and learning, and ambiguity in the definitions of research and audit. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations emerging from the study include the promotion of transparent research governance guidelines for practitioners, and the need for staff education about governance processes and greater parity between organizations in research governance processes.",
author = "M Howarth and Rosaleen Kneafsey",
year = "2005",
month = jan
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03341.x",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "675--683",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the impact of Research Governance in health and social care

AU - Howarth, M

AU - Kneafsey, Rosaleen

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - AIM: This paper reports a study exploring the impact and implementation of research governance in the North West region of England. BACKGROUND: In 2001, the UK Government launched a framework to ensure the governance of research within the National Health Service. Whilst this framework was undoubtedly geared towards improving the standards and practice of research, concerns have been raised in the academic literature about the potentially negative impact on future research. METHODS: A mixed method approach, using questionnaires (n = 350), semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a volunteer sample, was used to explore research staff perspectives about research governance. Survey data were analysed using Microsoft Excel, and a thematic analysis was used to elicit themes from the semi-structured interviews. The study lasted for 12 months and used a range of study sites, giving insight into potentially different experiences or approaches to implementing the research governance framework. FINDINGS: Questionnaire data revealed a good level of awareness about the Research Governance Framework. However, a range of concerns was also raised, such as the increased workload associated with the research governance application process and lack of transparency about the process. Five themes emerged from the focus groups: control, epistemology, organizational issues, impact on teaching and learning, and ambiguity in the definitions of research and audit. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations emerging from the study include the promotion of transparent research governance guidelines for practitioners, and the need for staff education about governance processes and greater parity between organizations in research governance processes.

AB - AIM: This paper reports a study exploring the impact and implementation of research governance in the North West region of England. BACKGROUND: In 2001, the UK Government launched a framework to ensure the governance of research within the National Health Service. Whilst this framework was undoubtedly geared towards improving the standards and practice of research, concerns have been raised in the academic literature about the potentially negative impact on future research. METHODS: A mixed method approach, using questionnaires (n = 350), semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a volunteer sample, was used to explore research staff perspectives about research governance. Survey data were analysed using Microsoft Excel, and a thematic analysis was used to elicit themes from the semi-structured interviews. The study lasted for 12 months and used a range of study sites, giving insight into potentially different experiences or approaches to implementing the research governance framework. FINDINGS: Questionnaire data revealed a good level of awareness about the Research Governance Framework. However, a range of concerns was also raised, such as the increased workload associated with the research governance application process and lack of transparency about the process. Five themes emerged from the focus groups: control, epistemology, organizational issues, impact on teaching and learning, and ambiguity in the definitions of research and audit. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations emerging from the study include the promotion of transparent research governance guidelines for practitioners, and the need for staff education about governance processes and greater parity between organizations in research governance processes.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03341.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03341.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15737227

VL - 49

SP - 675

EP - 683

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 6

ER -