Experience of and in time

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Standard

Experience of and in time. / Phillips, Ian.

In: Philosophy Compass, Vol. 9, No. 2, 04.02.2014, p. 131-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Phillips, Ian. / Experience of and in time. In: Philosophy Compass. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 131-144.

Bibtex

@article{d3c3719d4fcc462094ecc9fca0afd0fa,
title = "Experience of and in time",
abstract = "How must experience of time be structured in time? In particular, does the following principle, which I will call inheritance, hold: for any temporal property apparently presented in perceptual experience, experience itself has that same temporal property. For instance, if I hear Paul McCartney singing 'Hey Jude', must my auditory experience of the 'Hey' itself precede my auditory experience of the 'Jude', or can the temporal order of these experiences come apart from the order the words are experienced as having? A number of recent authors (Phillips Experience and Time, 'The Temporal Structure of Experience', Soteriou 'Perceiving Events', Hoerl '{"}A Succession of Feelings, in and of Itself, is Not a Feeling of Succession{"}', Rashbrook) claim, to paraphrase Martin (399), that inheritance best characterises how our temporal experience seems to initial reflective intuition. For this reason, Phillips takes the principle to form part of our na{\"i}ve view of temporal experience. An opposing group of theorists object that inheritance is subject to empirical counter-example. This article surveys such challenges. Section 2 considers Grush's case against inheritance based on postdiction. Section 3 examines Watzl's anti-inheritance argument based on silencing effects. Finally, Section 4 explores a number of alleged counter-examples proposed by Lee ('Temporal Experience and the Temporal Structure of Experience'). Section 1 provides essential background to the debate.",
author = "Ian Phillips",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1111/phc3.12107",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "131--144",
journal = "Philosophy Compass",
issn = "1747-9991",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience of and in time

AU - Phillips, Ian

PY - 2014/2/4

Y1 - 2014/2/4

N2 - How must experience of time be structured in time? In particular, does the following principle, which I will call inheritance, hold: for any temporal property apparently presented in perceptual experience, experience itself has that same temporal property. For instance, if I hear Paul McCartney singing 'Hey Jude', must my auditory experience of the 'Hey' itself precede my auditory experience of the 'Jude', or can the temporal order of these experiences come apart from the order the words are experienced as having? A number of recent authors (Phillips Experience and Time, 'The Temporal Structure of Experience', Soteriou 'Perceiving Events', Hoerl '"A Succession of Feelings, in and of Itself, is Not a Feeling of Succession"', Rashbrook) claim, to paraphrase Martin (399), that inheritance best characterises how our temporal experience seems to initial reflective intuition. For this reason, Phillips takes the principle to form part of our naïve view of temporal experience. An opposing group of theorists object that inheritance is subject to empirical counter-example. This article surveys such challenges. Section 2 considers Grush's case against inheritance based on postdiction. Section 3 examines Watzl's anti-inheritance argument based on silencing effects. Finally, Section 4 explores a number of alleged counter-examples proposed by Lee ('Temporal Experience and the Temporal Structure of Experience'). Section 1 provides essential background to the debate.

AB - How must experience of time be structured in time? In particular, does the following principle, which I will call inheritance, hold: for any temporal property apparently presented in perceptual experience, experience itself has that same temporal property. For instance, if I hear Paul McCartney singing 'Hey Jude', must my auditory experience of the 'Hey' itself precede my auditory experience of the 'Jude', or can the temporal order of these experiences come apart from the order the words are experienced as having? A number of recent authors (Phillips Experience and Time, 'The Temporal Structure of Experience', Soteriou 'Perceiving Events', Hoerl '"A Succession of Feelings, in and of Itself, is Not a Feeling of Succession"', Rashbrook) claim, to paraphrase Martin (399), that inheritance best characterises how our temporal experience seems to initial reflective intuition. For this reason, Phillips takes the principle to form part of our naïve view of temporal experience. An opposing group of theorists object that inheritance is subject to empirical counter-example. This article surveys such challenges. Section 2 considers Grush's case against inheritance based on postdiction. Section 3 examines Watzl's anti-inheritance argument based on silencing effects. Finally, Section 4 explores a number of alleged counter-examples proposed by Lee ('Temporal Experience and the Temporal Structure of Experience'). Section 1 provides essential background to the debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898928801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/phc3.12107

DO - 10.1111/phc3.12107

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84898928801

VL - 9

SP - 131

EP - 144

JO - Philosophy Compass

JF - Philosophy Compass

SN - 1747-9991

IS - 2

ER -