Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in a randomized trial of patients with Crohn’s disease

William J. Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan, Edward V. Loftus, Laurent Peyrin-biroulet, Gert Van Assche, Geert D’haens, Stefan Schreiber, Jean-frederic Colombel, James D. Lewis, Subrata Ghosh, Alessandro Armuzzi, Ellen Scherl, Hans Herfarth, Lauren Vitale, Mohamed-eslam F. Mohamed, Ahmed A. Othman, Qian Zhou, Bidan Huang, Roopal B. Thakkar, Aileen L. PanganAna P. Lacerda, Julian Panes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
291 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background & Aims: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, in a randomized trial of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD).

Methods: We performed a double-blind, phase 2 trial in adults with moderate to severe CD and inadequate response or intolerance to immunosuppressants or tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) to groups given placebo or 3 mg, 6 mg, 12 mg, or 24 mg upadacitinib twice daily, or 24 mg once daily, and evaluated by ileocolonoscopy at weeks 12 or 16 of the induction period. Patients who completed week 16 were re-randomized to a 36-week period of maintenance therapy with upadacitinib. The primary endpoints were clinical remission at week 16 and endoscopic remission at week 12 or 16 using multiple comparison procedure and modeling and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, with a 2-sided level of 10%.

Results: Among the 220 patients in the study, clinical remission was achieved by 13% of patients receiving 3 mg upadacitinib, 27% of patients receiving 6 mg upadacitinib (P<.1 vs placebo), 11% of patients receiving 12 mg upadacitinib, and 22% of patients receiving 24 mg upadacitinib twice daily, and 14% of patients receiving 24 mg upadacitinib once daily, vs 11% of patients receiving placebo; endoscopic remission was achieved by 10% (P<.1 vs placebo), 8%, 8% (P<.1 vs placebo), 22% (P<.01 vs placebo), and 14% (P<.05 vs placebo) of patients receiving upadacitinib, respectively, vs none of the patients receiving placebo. Endoscopic but not clinical remission increased with dose during the induction period. Efficacy was maintained for most endpoints through week 52. During the induction period, patients in the upadacitinib groups had higher incidences of infections and serious infections versus placebo. Patients in the twice-daily 12 mg and 24 mg upadacitinib groups had significant increases in total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, compared with patients in the placebo group.

Conclusions: In a phase 2 trial of patients with CD, upadacitinib induced endoscopic remission in a significant proportion of patients, compared with placebo. Upadacitinib’s benefit–risk profile supports further development for treatment of CD. Clinicaltrials.gov ID no: NCT02365649
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2123-2138.e8
JournalGastroenterology
Volume158
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

Keywords

  • CDAI
  • CELEST trial
  • IBD
  • JAK inhibitor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in a randomized trial of patients with Crohn’s disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this