Early identification of severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective observational study

Frances Grudzinska, Kerrie Aldridge, Sian Hughes, Peter Nightingale, Mansoor Bangnash, Rachel Dancer, Dhruv Parekh, Jaimin Patel, Elizabeth Sapey, David Thickett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
188 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of sepsis worldwide. Prompt identification of those at high risk of adverse outcomes improves survival by enabling early escalation of care. There are multiple severity assessment tools recommended for risk stratification; however, there is no consensus as to which tool should be used for those with CAP. We sought to assess whether pneumonia-specific, generic sepsis or early warning scores were most accurate at predicting adverse outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases of CAP admitted to a large, adult tertiary hospital in the UK between October 2014 and January 2016. All cases of CAP were eligible for inclusion and were reviewed by a senior respiratory physician to confirm the diagnosis. The association between the CURB65, Lac-CURB-65, quick Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment tool (qSOFA) score and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) at the time of admission and outcome measures including intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day and 365-day all-cause mortality was assessed. Results 1545 cases were included with 30-day mortality of 19%. Increasing score was significantly associated with increased risk of poor outcomes for all four tools. Overall accuracy assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was significantly greater for the CURB65 and Lac-CURB-65 scores than qSOFA. At admission, a CURB65 ≥2, Lac-CURB-65 ≥moderate, qSOFA ≥2 and NEWS ≥medium identified 85.0%, 96.4%, 40.3% and 79.0% of those who died within 30 days, respectively. A Lac-CURB-65 ≥moderate had the highest negative predictive value: 95.6%. Conclusion All four scoring systems can stratify according to increasing risk in CAP; however, when a confident diagnosis of pneumonia can be made, these data support the use of pneumonia-specific tools rather than generic sepsis or early warning scores.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000438
JournalBMJ Open Respiratory Research
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • CAP
  • CURB65
  • NEWS
  • community acquired pneumonia
  • lac-curb-65
  • qsofa
  • sepsis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early identification of severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this