Does sector matter for the quality of care services? A secondary analysis of social care services regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Does sector matter for the quality of care services? A secondary analysis of social care services regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland. / Bach-mortensen, Anders Malthe; Montgomery, Paul.

In: BMJ open, Vol. 9, No. 2, e022975, 15.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{c12c3b2188ce4afcb48f3421c4692436,
title = "Does sector matter for the quality of care services? A secondary analysis of social care services regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland",
abstract = "Objectives Social services are increasingly commissioned to third and for-profit sector providers, but little is known about whether and how these changes influence quality indicators. We assessed quality-related outcomes across for-profit, public and third sector organisations delivering social care services.Design A secondary analysis was conducted on publically available data collected by the independent regulator of social care organisations in Scotland. All outcomes are reported as predicted probabilities derived from multivariate logistic regression coefficients. Generalised ordered logit models are utilised for the quality domains and the risk assessment score and logistic regression for whether complaints or requirements were issued to organisations.Setting Organisations inspected by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland.Population 13 310 social care organisations (eg, nursing homes and day care organisations).Primary outcomes The quality and risk domains collected by the Care Inspectorate and complaints and requirements issued to organisations within the last 3 years.Results Controlling for multiple factors, we find that public and third sector providers performed consistently and statistically significantly better than for-profit organisations on most outcomes. For example, for-profit services were the most likely to be rated as high and medium risk (6.9% and 13.2%, respectively), and the least likely to be classified as low risk (79.9%). Public providers had the highest probability of being categorised as low risk (91.1%), and the lowest probability of having their services classified as medium (6.9%) and high risk (2%), followed by third sector providers (86%, 8.5% and 4.5%, respectively). Public providers performed better than third sector providers in some outcomes, but differences were relatively low and inconsistent.Conclusion Public and third sector providers were rated considerably higher than their for-profit counterparts on most observed outcomes. Regulators might use this information to consider how social care providers across sector are incentivised to manage their resources.",
keywords = "commissioning of care, quality Of care, quasi-markets, social care, third sector organisations, typology of sector",
author = "Bach-mortensen, {Anders Malthe} and Paul Montgomery",
note = "{\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
month = feb
day = "15",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022975",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does sector matter for the quality of care services? A secondary analysis of social care services regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland

AU - Bach-mortensen, Anders Malthe

AU - Montgomery, Paul

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - Objectives Social services are increasingly commissioned to third and for-profit sector providers, but little is known about whether and how these changes influence quality indicators. We assessed quality-related outcomes across for-profit, public and third sector organisations delivering social care services.Design A secondary analysis was conducted on publically available data collected by the independent regulator of social care organisations in Scotland. All outcomes are reported as predicted probabilities derived from multivariate logistic regression coefficients. Generalised ordered logit models are utilised for the quality domains and the risk assessment score and logistic regression for whether complaints or requirements were issued to organisations.Setting Organisations inspected by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland.Population 13 310 social care organisations (eg, nursing homes and day care organisations).Primary outcomes The quality and risk domains collected by the Care Inspectorate and complaints and requirements issued to organisations within the last 3 years.Results Controlling for multiple factors, we find that public and third sector providers performed consistently and statistically significantly better than for-profit organisations on most outcomes. For example, for-profit services were the most likely to be rated as high and medium risk (6.9% and 13.2%, respectively), and the least likely to be classified as low risk (79.9%). Public providers had the highest probability of being categorised as low risk (91.1%), and the lowest probability of having their services classified as medium (6.9%) and high risk (2%), followed by third sector providers (86%, 8.5% and 4.5%, respectively). Public providers performed better than third sector providers in some outcomes, but differences were relatively low and inconsistent.Conclusion Public and third sector providers were rated considerably higher than their for-profit counterparts on most observed outcomes. Regulators might use this information to consider how social care providers across sector are incentivised to manage their resources.

AB - Objectives Social services are increasingly commissioned to third and for-profit sector providers, but little is known about whether and how these changes influence quality indicators. We assessed quality-related outcomes across for-profit, public and third sector organisations delivering social care services.Design A secondary analysis was conducted on publically available data collected by the independent regulator of social care organisations in Scotland. All outcomes are reported as predicted probabilities derived from multivariate logistic regression coefficients. Generalised ordered logit models are utilised for the quality domains and the risk assessment score and logistic regression for whether complaints or requirements were issued to organisations.Setting Organisations inspected by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland.Population 13 310 social care organisations (eg, nursing homes and day care organisations).Primary outcomes The quality and risk domains collected by the Care Inspectorate and complaints and requirements issued to organisations within the last 3 years.Results Controlling for multiple factors, we find that public and third sector providers performed consistently and statistically significantly better than for-profit organisations on most outcomes. For example, for-profit services were the most likely to be rated as high and medium risk (6.9% and 13.2%, respectively), and the least likely to be classified as low risk (79.9%). Public providers had the highest probability of being categorised as low risk (91.1%), and the lowest probability of having their services classified as medium (6.9%) and high risk (2%), followed by third sector providers (86%, 8.5% and 4.5%, respectively). Public providers performed better than third sector providers in some outcomes, but differences were relatively low and inconsistent.Conclusion Public and third sector providers were rated considerably higher than their for-profit counterparts on most observed outcomes. Regulators might use this information to consider how social care providers across sector are incentivised to manage their resources.

KW - commissioning of care

KW - quality Of care

KW - quasi-markets

KW - social care

KW - third sector organisations

KW - typology of sector

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061696028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022975

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022975

M3 - Article

C2 - 30772845

VL - 9

JO - BMJ open

JF - BMJ open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e022975

ER -