Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end of life practices : a cross-sectional survey.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end of life practices : a cross-sectional survey. / Merry, Alan; Moharib, Magdi; Devcich, Daniel; Webster, M Louise; Ives, Jonathan; Draper, Heather.

In: BMJ open, Vol. 3, No. 5, e002598 , 22.05.2013, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Merry, Alan ; Moharib, Magdi ; Devcich, Daniel ; Webster, M Louise ; Ives, Jonathan ; Draper, Heather. / Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end of life practices : a cross-sectional survey. In: BMJ open. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 5. pp. 1-8.

Bibtex

@article{45bce93a9eb448aca3d81bbe72b90e62,
title = "Doctors{\textquoteright} willingness to give honest answers about end of life practices : a cross-sectional survey.",
abstract = "Objectives We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. Design Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. Setting New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. Participants The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. Primary and secondary outcome measures Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. Results Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. Conclusions Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort. ",
author = "Alan Merry and Magdi Moharib and Daniel Devcich and Webster, {M Louise} and Jonathan Ives and Heather Draper",
year = "2013",
month = may,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "BMJ open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end of life practices : a cross-sectional survey.

AU - Merry, Alan

AU - Moharib, Magdi

AU - Devcich, Daniel

AU - Webster, M Louise

AU - Ives, Jonathan

AU - Draper, Heather

PY - 2013/5/22

Y1 - 2013/5/22

N2 - Objectives We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. Design Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. Setting New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. Participants The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. Primary and secondary outcome measures Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. Results Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. Conclusions Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort.

AB - Objectives We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK. Design Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire. Setting New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings. Participants The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives. Primary and secondary outcome measures Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices. Results Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9–91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research. Conclusions Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598

M3 - Article

C2 - 23793694

VL - 3

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - BMJ open

JF - BMJ open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

M1 - e002598

ER -