Abstract
This paper focuses on the diversified climate action the international community is currently witnessing. Besides examining possible reasons for the failure of the top down approach to effectively halt rising emission levels, the development of bottom-up initiatives is discussed. In addition, this paper evaluates the European Union’s emissions trading system (EU ETS) according to two criteria of justice, with a special focus on two characteristics of the EU ETS: grandfathering and offsetting. The final section of this paper addresses the rise of emissions trading systems and considers the claims made by prominent commentators who believe emissions trading to be inherently unethical. The paper concludes, first, that whether emissions trading is morally reprehensible depends on its design and, second, that the EU ETS fails to respect justice-based criteria and points to the unwillingness of EU leaders to mend a flawed climate policy tool.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings from the 50th Societas Ethica Annual Conference 2013. |
| Subtitle of host publication | Climate change, sustainability, and an ethics of an open future. August 22-25; 2013; Soesterberg; The Netherlands |
| Editors | Göran Collste, Lars Reuter |
| Publisher | Linköping University Electronic Press |
| Pages | 63-78 |
| Volume | 098 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-91-7519-289-5 |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Apr 2014 |
Keywords
- climate governance
- emissions trading
- EU ETS
- grandfathering
