Diversification and internationalization in the sociological study of science and religion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Diversification and internationalization in the sociological study of science and religion. / Catto, Rebecca; Jones, Stephen; Kaden, Tom; Elsdon-Baker, Fern.

In: Sociology Compass, Vol. 13, No. 8, e12721, 01.08.2019, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{93ac2b478eb24f72a188b9742e5374b8,
title = "Diversification and internationalization in the sociological study of science and religion",
abstract = "Classical sociology addressed the relationship between science and religion, but interest in the topic waned during the 20th century. A second wave of research has emerged in the 21st century, focusing on scientists' (ir)religiosity, evolution, and the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of scientific concepts. Most of this research has been conducted in the United States, used quantitative methods, and focused on creationism, although scholars have recently begun to explore different research methods and sites. Their results suggest that the “conflict thesis” is not valid and that publics and scientists' views tend to be fluid and strongly shaped by national context. The literature on nonreligion has also expanded, but its connection to science remains ripe for further development. A more intersectional approach would also benefit the field, as would increased engagement between public understanding of science scholars and sociologists studying science and religion. Research in both areas is showing that attitudes toward science and religion cannot be understood solely in terms of knowledge about either domain. There is scope for more empirical and theoretical work internationally eschewing the assumption that science and religion conflict and focusing more on identity, culture, and power relations.",
author = "Rebecca Catto and Stephen Jones and Tom Kaden and Fern Elsdon-Baker",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/soc4.12721",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Sociology Compass",
issn = "1751-9020",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversification and internationalization in the sociological study of science and religion

AU - Catto, Rebecca

AU - Jones, Stephen

AU - Kaden, Tom

AU - Elsdon-Baker, Fern

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Classical sociology addressed the relationship between science and religion, but interest in the topic waned during the 20th century. A second wave of research has emerged in the 21st century, focusing on scientists' (ir)religiosity, evolution, and the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of scientific concepts. Most of this research has been conducted in the United States, used quantitative methods, and focused on creationism, although scholars have recently begun to explore different research methods and sites. Their results suggest that the “conflict thesis” is not valid and that publics and scientists' views tend to be fluid and strongly shaped by national context. The literature on nonreligion has also expanded, but its connection to science remains ripe for further development. A more intersectional approach would also benefit the field, as would increased engagement between public understanding of science scholars and sociologists studying science and religion. Research in both areas is showing that attitudes toward science and religion cannot be understood solely in terms of knowledge about either domain. There is scope for more empirical and theoretical work internationally eschewing the assumption that science and religion conflict and focusing more on identity, culture, and power relations.

AB - Classical sociology addressed the relationship between science and religion, but interest in the topic waned during the 20th century. A second wave of research has emerged in the 21st century, focusing on scientists' (ir)religiosity, evolution, and the relationship between knowledge and acceptance of scientific concepts. Most of this research has been conducted in the United States, used quantitative methods, and focused on creationism, although scholars have recently begun to explore different research methods and sites. Their results suggest that the “conflict thesis” is not valid and that publics and scientists' views tend to be fluid and strongly shaped by national context. The literature on nonreligion has also expanded, but its connection to science remains ripe for further development. A more intersectional approach would also benefit the field, as would increased engagement between public understanding of science scholars and sociologists studying science and religion. Research in both areas is showing that attitudes toward science and religion cannot be understood solely in terms of knowledge about either domain. There is scope for more empirical and theoretical work internationally eschewing the assumption that science and religion conflict and focusing more on identity, culture, and power relations.

U2 - 10.1111/soc4.12721

DO - 10.1111/soc4.12721

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Sociology Compass

JF - Sociology Compass

SN - 1751-9020

IS - 8

M1 - e12721

ER -