Disinfection byproducts and bladder cancer. A pooled analysis

CM Villanueva, KP Cantor, S Cordier, Jouni Jaakkola, WD King, S Porru, M Kogevinas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    340 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Exposure to disinfection byproducts in drinking water has been associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. We pooled the primary data from 6 case-control studies of bladder cancer that used trihalomethanes as a marker of disinfection byproducts. METHODS: Two studies were included from the United States and one each from Canada, France, Italy, and Finland. Inclusion criteria were availability of detailed data on trihalomethane exposure and individual water consumption. The analysis included 2806 cases and 5254 controls, all of whom had measures of known exposure for at least 70% of the exposure window of 40 years before the interview. Cumulative exposure to trihalomethanes was estimated by combining individual year-by-year average trihalomethane level and daily tap water consumption. RESULTS: There was an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.24 in men exposed to an average of more than 1 microg/L (ppb) trihalomethanes compared with those who had lower or no exposure (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.41). Estimated relative risks increased with increasing exposure, with an OR of 1.44 (1.20-1.73) for exposure higher than 50 microg/L (ppb). Similar results were found with other indices of trihalomethane exposure. Among women, trihalomethane exposure was not associated with bladder cancer risk (0.95; 0.76-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: These findings strengthen the hypothesis that the risk of bladder cancer is increased with long-term exposure to disinfection byproducts at levels currently observed in many industrialized countries.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)357-367
    Number of pages11
    JournalEpidemiology
    Volume15
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Disinfection byproducts and bladder cancer. A pooled analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this