Disagreement, equal weight and commutativity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Colleges, School and Institutes


How should we respond to cases of disagreement where two epistemic agents have the same evidence but come to different conclusions? Adam Elga has provided a Bayesian framework for addressing this question. In this paper, I shall highlight two unfortunate consequences of this framework, which Elga does not anticipate. Both problems derive from a failure of commutativity between application of the equal weight view and updating in the light of other evidence.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-326
Number of pages6
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2009