Disagreement, equal weight and commutativity
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Colleges, School and Institutes
How should we respond to cases of disagreement where two epistemic agents have the same evidence but come to different conclusions? Adam Elga has provided a Bayesian framework for addressing this question. In this paper, I shall highlight two unfortunate consequences of this framework, which Elga does not anticipate. Both problems derive from a failure of commutativity between application of the equal weight view and updating in the light of other evidence.
|Number of pages||6|
|Publication status||Published - 10 Mar 2009|