TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a scale to measure fidelity to manualized group-based cognitive behavioural interventions for people with intellectual disabilities
AU - Jahoda, Andrew
AU - Willner, Paul
AU - Rose, John
AU - Kroese, Biza Stenfert
AU - Lammie, Claire
AU - Shead, Jennifer
AU - Woodgate, Christopher
AU - Gillespie, David
AU - Townson, Julia
AU - Felce, David
AU - Stimpson, Aimee
AU - Rose, Nikki
AU - MacMahon, Pamela
AU - Nuttall, Jacqueline
AU - Hood, Kerenza
PY - 2013/11/1
Y1 - 2013/11/1
N2 - The context for the present study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a group-based anger-management intervention, delivered by day-service staff. We aimed to develop a scale to measure the fidelity of manualized cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered to adults with intellectual disabilities in group-based settings. A 30-item monitoring instrument (the MAnualized Group Intervention Check: MAGIC) was adapted from an existing fidelity-monitor instrument for individual CBT. Two sessions for 27 groups were observed by pairs of monitors who had no other contact with the intervention. 16 observers participated, in 15 unique pairings. Observers recorded high levels of inter-rater reliability and the scale had good internal consistency. Fidelity ratings predicted two key outcomes of the intervention, and were themselves predicted by the therapists' clinical supervisors.
AB - The context for the present study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a group-based anger-management intervention, delivered by day-service staff. We aimed to develop a scale to measure the fidelity of manualized cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered to adults with intellectual disabilities in group-based settings. A 30-item monitoring instrument (the MAnualized Group Intervention Check: MAGIC) was adapted from an existing fidelity-monitor instrument for individual CBT. Two sessions for 27 groups were observed by pairs of monitors who had no other contact with the intervention. 16 observers participated, in 15 unique pairings. Observers recorded high levels of inter-rater reliability and the scale had good internal consistency. Fidelity ratings predicted two key outcomes of the intervention, and were themselves predicted by the therapists' clinical supervisors.
KW - Cognitive-behavioural therapy
KW - Fidelity
KW - Group
KW - Intellectual disability
KW - Manual
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884705458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 24077070
AN - SCOPUS:84884705458
SN - 0891-4222
VL - 34
SP - 4210
EP - 4221
JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities
JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities
IS - 11
ER -