Current challenges of implementing anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change in models contributing to climate change assessments

Land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) represents one of the key drivers of global environmental change. However, the processes and drivers of anthropogenic land-use activity are still overly simplistically implemented in Terrestrial Biosphere Models (TBMs). The published results of these models are used in major assessments of processes and impacts of global environmental change, such as the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Fully coupled models of climate, land use and biogeochemical cycles to explore land use – climate interactions across spatial scales are currently not available. Instead, information on land use is provided as exogenous data from the land-use change modules of Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) to TBMs. In this article, we discuss, based on literature review and illustrative analysis
of empirical and modeled LULCC data, three major challenges of this current LULCC representation and their implications for land use – climate interaction studies: (I) provision of consistent, harmonized, land-use time series spanning from historical reconstructions to future projections while accounting for uncertainties associated with different land-use modeling approaches, (II) accounting for sub-grid processes and bi-directional changes (gross changes) across spatial scales and (III) the allocation strategy of independent land-use data at the grid cell level in TBMs. We discuss the reasons that hamper the
development of improved land-use representation that sufficiently accounts for uncertainties in the land-use modeling process. We propose that LULCC data-provider and –user communities should engage in the joint development and evaluation of enhanced LULCC time series, which account for the diversity of LULCC modeling, and increasingly include empirically based information about sub-grid processes and land-use transition trajectories, to improve the representation of land use in TBMs. Moreover, we suggest to concentrate on the development of integrated modeling frameworks that may provide further
understanding of possible land-climate-society feedbacks.