Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease

Sue Jowett, Pelham Barton, Andrea Roalfe, Kate Fletcher, F D Richard Hobbs, Richard McManus, Jonathan Mant

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
477 Downloads (Pure)
Original languageEnglish
JournalPLoS ONE
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sept 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

  • Jowett_et_al_Cost-effectiveness_analysis_PLos_ONE_2017

    Jowett S, Barton P, Roalfe A, Fletcher K, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, et al. (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182625

    Accepted author manuscript, 253 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
  • high_risk_paper_polypill_PLOSOne_Figure1

    Jowett S, Barton P, Roalfe A, Fletcher K, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, et al. (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182625

    Accepted author manuscript, 12.5 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
  • high_risk_paper_polypill_PLOSOne_supplementary

    Jowett S, Barton P, Roalfe A, Fletcher K, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, et al. (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182625

    Accepted author manuscript, 75.3 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
  • Technical_appendix_PLOS_One

    Jowett S, Barton P, Roalfe A, Fletcher K, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, et al. (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182625

    Accepted author manuscript, 125 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
  • Jowett_et_al_Cost-effectiveness_analysis_PLos_ONE_2017

    Jowett S, Barton P, Roalfe A, Fletcher K, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, et al. (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182625

    Final published version, 1.73 MBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

    Cite this