Contribution of physician assistants/associates to secondary care: A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Authors

  • Mary Halter
  • Carly Wheeler
  • Ferruccio Pelone
  • Heather Gage
  • Simon de Lusignan
  • Jim Parle
  • Robert Grant
  • Jonathan Gabe
  • Vari M. Drennan

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • Kingston University and St. George's
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
  • Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Institute of Clinical Sciences
  • University of Surrey

Abstract

Objective To appraise and synthesise research on the impact of physician assistants/associates (PA) in secondary care, specifically acute internal medicine, care of the elderly, emergency medicine, trauma and orthopaedics, and mental health. Design Systematic review. Setting Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, ASSIA, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice, EconLit and Cochrane), reference lists and related articles. Included articles Peer-reviewed articles of any study design, published in English, 1995-2017. Interventions Blinded parallel processes were used to screen abstracts and full text, data extractions and quality assessments against published guidelines. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Outcome measures Impact on: patients' experiences and outcomes, service organisation, working practices, other professional groups and costs. Results 5472 references were identified and 161 read in full; 16 were included - emergency medicine (7), trauma and orthopaedics (6), acute internal medicine (2), mental health (1) and care of the elderly (0). All studies were observational, with variable methodological quality. In emergency medicine and in trauma and orthopaedics, when PAs are added to teams, reduced waiting and process times, lower charges, equivalent readmission rate and good acceptability to staff and patients are reported. Analgesia prescribing, operative complications and mortality outcomes were variable. In internal medicine outcomes of care provided by PAs and doctors were equivalent. Conclusions PAs have been deployed to increase the capacity of a team, enabling gains in waiting time, throughput, continuity and medical cover. When PAs were compared with medical staff, reassuringly there was little or no negative effect on health outcomes or cost. The difficulty of attributing cause and effect in complex systems where work is organised in teams is highlighted. Further rigorous evaluation is required to address the complexity of the PA role, reporting on more than one setting, and including comparison between PAs and roles for which they are substituting. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016032895.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere019573
JournalBMJ open
Volume8
Issue number6
Early online date19 Jun 2018
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jun 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas