TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project
T2 - electrode selection matrix
AU - Besomi, Manuela
AU - Hodges, Paul W
AU - Van Dieën, Jaap
AU - Carson, Richard G
AU - Clancy, Edward A
AU - Disselhorst-Klug, Catherine
AU - Holobar, Aleš
AU - Hug, François
AU - Kiernan, Matthew C
AU - Lowery, Madeleine
AU - McGill, Kevin
AU - Merletti, Roberto
AU - Perreault, Eric
AU - Søgaard, Karen
AU - Tucker, Kylie
AU - Besier, Thor
AU - Enoka, Roger
AU - Falla, Deborah
AU - Farina, Dario
AU - Gandevia, Simon
AU - Rothwell, John C
AU - Vicenzino, Bill
AU - Wrigley, Tim
N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - The Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project is an international initiative which aims to guide decision-making in recording, analysis, and interpretation of electromyographic (EMG) data. The quality of the EMG recording, and validity of its interpretation depend on many characteristics of the recording set-up and analysis procedures. Different electrode types (i.e., surface and intramuscular) will influence the recorded signal and its interpretation. This report presents a matrix to consider the best electrode type selection for recording EMG, and the process undertaken to achieve consensus. Four electrode types were considered: (1) conventional surface electrode, (2) surface matrix or array electrode, (3) fine-wire electrode, and (4) needle electrode. General features, pros, and cons of each electrode type are presented first. This information is followed by recommendations for specific types of muscles, the information that can be estimated, the typical representativeness of the recording and the types of contractions for which the electrode is best suited. This matrix is intended to help researchers when selecting and reporting the electrode type in EMG studies.
AB - The Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project is an international initiative which aims to guide decision-making in recording, analysis, and interpretation of electromyographic (EMG) data. The quality of the EMG recording, and validity of its interpretation depend on many characteristics of the recording set-up and analysis procedures. Different electrode types (i.e., surface and intramuscular) will influence the recorded signal and its interpretation. This report presents a matrix to consider the best electrode type selection for recording EMG, and the process undertaken to achieve consensus. Four electrode types were considered: (1) conventional surface electrode, (2) surface matrix or array electrode, (3) fine-wire electrode, and (4) needle electrode. General features, pros, and cons of each electrode type are presented first. This information is followed by recommendations for specific types of muscles, the information that can be estimated, the typical representativeness of the recording and the types of contractions for which the electrode is best suited. This matrix is intended to help researchers when selecting and reporting the electrode type in EMG studies.
KW - consensus
KW - electrodes/standards
KW - electromyography/instrumentation
KW - humans
KW - muscle, skeletal/physiology
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 31352156
SN - 1050-6411
VL - 48
SP - 128
EP - 144
JO - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
JF - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
ER -