Comparisons of indoor active and passive air sampling methods for emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants in Beijing, China offices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Comparisons of indoor active and passive air sampling methods for emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants in Beijing, China offices. / Newton, Seth; Sellström, Ulla; Harrad, Stuart; Yu, Gang; de Wit, Cynthia A.

In: Emerging Contaminants, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 80-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{826072f56b764c0e90142e279b103617,
title = "Comparisons of indoor active and passive air sampling methods for emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants in Beijing, China offices",
abstract = "One active and two passive air sampling configurations were deployed simultaneously in three offices in Beijing, China to test their comparability for sampling emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants spanning a large range of octanol–air partition coefficients (KOA). Sampling in each office was carried out for three consecutive 28-day periods in the spring-summer of 2013. The active sampler was run for 2.5 h at different times every day for 28 days to parallel the passive samplers and sample a total volume comparable to that sampled by the passive samplers (∼20 m3). At the end of each 28-day sampling period, a separate active air sample was taken by running the sampler pump continuously for about 2.5 days. The comparability of measured concentrations varied between the air sampling configurations and for different compounds. The predominant compound measured in nearly all samples was BDE-209, a compound known to have heavy use in China. Several emerging flame retardants were also detected including DBE-DBCH, PBT, HBB, DDC-CO, and DBDPE. Very little of the tetra-hexabrominated BDEs associated with the technical PentaBDE product was observed.",
keywords = "Active air sampling, BFR, Emerging flame retardants, Flame retardants, Indoor air, Passive air sampling",
author = "Seth Newton and Ulla Sellstr{\"o}m and Stuart Harrad and Gang Yu and {de Wit}, {Cynthia A.}",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.emcon.2016.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "80--88",
journal = "Emerging Contaminants",
issn = "2405-6650",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of indoor active and passive air sampling methods for emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants in Beijing, China offices

AU - Newton, Seth

AU - Sellström, Ulla

AU - Harrad, Stuart

AU - Yu, Gang

AU - de Wit, Cynthia A.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - One active and two passive air sampling configurations were deployed simultaneously in three offices in Beijing, China to test their comparability for sampling emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants spanning a large range of octanol–air partition coefficients (KOA). Sampling in each office was carried out for three consecutive 28-day periods in the spring-summer of 2013. The active sampler was run for 2.5 h at different times every day for 28 days to parallel the passive samplers and sample a total volume comparable to that sampled by the passive samplers (∼20 m3). At the end of each 28-day sampling period, a separate active air sample was taken by running the sampler pump continuously for about 2.5 days. The comparability of measured concentrations varied between the air sampling configurations and for different compounds. The predominant compound measured in nearly all samples was BDE-209, a compound known to have heavy use in China. Several emerging flame retardants were also detected including DBE-DBCH, PBT, HBB, DDC-CO, and DBDPE. Very little of the tetra-hexabrominated BDEs associated with the technical PentaBDE product was observed.

AB - One active and two passive air sampling configurations were deployed simultaneously in three offices in Beijing, China to test their comparability for sampling emerging and legacy halogenated flame retardants spanning a large range of octanol–air partition coefficients (KOA). Sampling in each office was carried out for three consecutive 28-day periods in the spring-summer of 2013. The active sampler was run for 2.5 h at different times every day for 28 days to parallel the passive samplers and sample a total volume comparable to that sampled by the passive samplers (∼20 m3). At the end of each 28-day sampling period, a separate active air sample was taken by running the sampler pump continuously for about 2.5 days. The comparability of measured concentrations varied between the air sampling configurations and for different compounds. The predominant compound measured in nearly all samples was BDE-209, a compound known to have heavy use in China. Several emerging flame retardants were also detected including DBE-DBCH, PBT, HBB, DDC-CO, and DBDPE. Very little of the tetra-hexabrominated BDEs associated with the technical PentaBDE product was observed.

KW - Active air sampling

KW - BFR

KW - Emerging flame retardants

KW - Flame retardants

KW - Indoor air

KW - Passive air sampling

U2 - 10.1016/j.emcon.2016.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.emcon.2016.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020608591

VL - 2

SP - 80

EP - 88

JO - Emerging Contaminants

JF - Emerging Contaminants

SN - 2405-6650

IS - 2

ER -