Cognitive style variables in participants' explanations of conceptual metaphors

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    572 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    71 University students were first asked to explain three conceptual metaphors. Then the participants’ cognitive styles were classified into “analytic” or “holistic and “imager” or “verbaliser” by means of the Riding (1991) computer assisted test of cognitive styles. The results of the experiment revealed cognitive style variables in subjects’ preferred strategies to explain the metaphors: (a) “holistic thinkers” were more likely than “analytic” ones to blend their conception of the target domain with the source domain ; and (b) “imagers” were more likely than “verbalisers” to refer to stereotypical images to explain the metaphors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-187
    Number of pages11
    JournalMetaphor and Symbol
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive style variables in participants' explanations of conceptual metaphors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this