Cognitive Ethology for humans: Inconvenient truth or attentional deficit?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Cognitive Ethology for humans: Inconvenient truth or attentional deficit? / Sebanz, Natalie; Knoblich, Gunther; Humphreys, Glyn.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 3, 01.08.2008, p. 347-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{a57f2b52403f4992aaf24ce9aff203af,
title = "Cognitive Ethology for humans: Inconvenient truth or attentional deficit?",
abstract = "We discuss Kingstone et al.s target article in the light of emerging work on cognitive ethology.",
author = "Natalie Sebanz and Gunther Knoblich and Glyn Humphreys",
year = "2008",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1348/000712608x297080",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "347--350",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive Ethology for humans: Inconvenient truth or attentional deficit?

AU - Sebanz, Natalie

AU - Knoblich, Gunther

AU - Humphreys, Glyn

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - We discuss Kingstone et al.s target article in the light of emerging work on cognitive ethology.

AB - We discuss Kingstone et al.s target article in the light of emerging work on cognitive ethology.

U2 - 10.1348/000712608x297080

DO - 10.1348/000712608x297080

M3 - Article

C2 - 18426687

VL - 99

SP - 347

EP - 350

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 3

ER -