TY - JOUR
T1 - Cleaning dirty hands? Some thoughts on private companies, migration and CSR in the European Union
AU - Bloom, Tendayi
PY - 2016/6/30
Y1 - 2016/6/30
N2 - Migration is so far little discussed in the CSR literature and CSR is little discussed in the migration literature. Where these discourses do come together, it is most commonly regarding how private companies affect migration patterns, the need for employers to adhere to State immigration policies, and the possible involvement of the private sector in activities relating to trafficking. However, European countries frequently use the services of private companies to carry out a range of migration related activities. This paper looks at the use of private companies to support a State’s pre-entry measures (carrier sanctions), internal measures (detention) and ejection (deportation). It presents some of the ways in which this delegation may be considered problematic and suggests a possible direction for a CSR case for corporations sometimes not to carry out States’ wishes in this sector. In particular, it suggests that there is scope for considering a business case for CSR in this sector, an ethical case and a legal case. It offers a brief discussion of how access to passenger transportation could in some circumstances be seen as a vital need. This paper uses the discussion of the involvement of the passenger transport industry in migration control to draw attention to two wider concerns. First, how can European CSR respond in situations where the European States themselves may be violating international norms? Second, is there scope for developing an understanding of CSR in the wider migration control sector?
AB - Migration is so far little discussed in the CSR literature and CSR is little discussed in the migration literature. Where these discourses do come together, it is most commonly regarding how private companies affect migration patterns, the need for employers to adhere to State immigration policies, and the possible involvement of the private sector in activities relating to trafficking. However, European countries frequently use the services of private companies to carry out a range of migration related activities. This paper looks at the use of private companies to support a State’s pre-entry measures (carrier sanctions), internal measures (detention) and ejection (deportation). It presents some of the ways in which this delegation may be considered problematic and suggests a possible direction for a CSR case for corporations sometimes not to carry out States’ wishes in this sector. In particular, it suggests that there is scope for considering a business case for CSR in this sector, an ethical case and a legal case. It offers a brief discussion of how access to passenger transportation could in some circumstances be seen as a vital need. This paper uses the discussion of the involvement of the passenger transport industry in migration control to draw attention to two wider concerns. First, how can European CSR respond in situations where the European States themselves may be violating international norms? Second, is there scope for developing an understanding of CSR in the wider migration control sector?
KW - migration
KW - rights
KW - CSR
KW - European Union
KW - political theory
UR - https://www.hrild.org/en/journal/hrild/index.html
UR - https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/hurandi10&id=147&men_tab=srchresults
UR - https://www.academia.edu/26923645/Cleaning_Dirty_Hands_Some_Thoughts_on_Private_Companies_Migration_and_CSR_in_the_European_Union_Human_Rights_and_International_Legal_Discourse_2016_
M3 - Article
SN - 1783-7014
VL - 10
SP - 139
EP - 159
JO - Human Rights and International Legal Discourse
JF - Human Rights and International Legal Discourse
IS - 1
ER -