Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed)
Colleges, School and Institutes
Metaphysicians typically distinguish sharply between grounding and causation, and philosophers of science typically distinguish sharply between causal and non-causal explanation, but there has been surprisingly little discussion of how exactly to draw these distinctions. In this paper I argue that six of the most obvious criteria fail to capture the intended distinction between causation and grounding. I propose and defend an alternative criterion in terms of the principles mediating the dependency, and I explore some of the implications of this criterion for the possibility of simultaneous causation in physics.
Note that this will be able to be released after a 12-month embargo, but I do not know the official publication date so cannot set the embargo dates at present.
|Title of host publication||The Foundation of Reality|
|Subtitle of host publication||Fundamentality, Space and Time|
|Editors||David Glick, George Darby, Anna Marmodoro|
|Publication status||Accepted/In press - 1 Jun 2019|